Global Warming Truth

[sparks]

   @techstuff


     I hope it is JC that shows up.  Alot better than this selfrighteous neglectful piece of shit that fucked over adam and eve.  I am basically tired of the whole crew.  All the angels could take a flying leap into oblivion for all I give a shit.
The dark ones the light ones and the old man.  JC was chill.  He loved his fellow man.  He hated politicians and moneylenders.  He was a rebel.  I figure JC and the gang were like a modern day motorcycle gang roaming around haveing a good old time spreading the love and fishing drinking lots of free wine and feeding the hungry curing the sick telling people how they should all be getting along.  Finally they showed up in the wrong sherrifs town and the whole peace movement went down faster than a whos panties in a busy brothel. 
    This doesnt appear to be the case because Noah's god is showing up again to irradicate all human poplulations so he can interbreed with Noah's wife and daughters to get his DNA back in action on Earth.  Some voice gets in my head and tells me to build a big boat so I can survive and let the rest of humanity perish I would a seek counselling. If this didnt work I would tell the voice in my head to fuck off and build his own boat.  Which leads us to the matter at hand.  If the rats that run the government want to run and hide in tunnels while the rest of the world meets JC let them.  I'm gonna stay right here on the surface and give the finger to whatever power is pulling this shit.  What have I got to loose.  My soul because I flashed some kissass angel the finger.  If going to heaven involves standing around having to listen to some faggot angels singing and brownosing some sort of king count me out I want to roll with JC.

[TechStuf]

Some voice gets in my head

Peace in Christ be upon you.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7dpGWYZMDc


Blessings in Christ Yeshua

[sparks]

  His peace is upon me. Thankyou for the blessing.  I love Jesus he showed us the way.  The rest of the angels and burning bushes and ritualistic stuff is less than productive thinking.

     I believe that it is impossible to live in harmony with nature given the population to natural rescource ratio of the present state of Earth.  We must either dominate it or the Earth will shake off the human population like we shake off a cold.  It appears she is running a fever to do just that.  Hmmmmm   Smart planets? 

[TechStuf]

His peace is upon me. Thankyou for the blessing.  I love Jesus he showed us the way

If His peace be upon you, then stop your cursing and be about His business lest He remove it from you.


You mock Yahweh, the Almighty at your own peril.

[silverfish]

Let's see, what will Paul say:

"I already dealt with this issue before, I'm not going to repeat myself."

"Those graphs are false because they are supported by big oil."

"The data is not reliable because it doesn't come from Wikipedia"

"You have shown yourself to be a (big oil supporter, idiot, liar, etc. whatever else I can dream up) Pirate, everyone else knows you are someone who takes things out of context."

"I looked over the numbers and they don't say what I want so they are false"

"Look, it wasn't even written by a climatologist"

"It wasn't written by the 97% of scientists that agree that man made global warming is a fact."

"I don't even want to talk to you guys anymore, but I keep talking because I would give 100% of my income to save the earth; but if you say I would do that then I will change what I quote from you and say what I wanted to say that I said."

"This thread is filled with big oil supporter idiots and everything they quote or write is false, NO MATTER WHAT!"

etc., etc., You are all wrong and liars and frauds. etc.

Did I miss anything? I'm sure new B.S. is coming. Just wait for it.

"Oh yeah, you must hate nature, while I love nature and the earth and Obama who I adore."

That should cover most of it.

Perceptive and funny, in my opinion. What makes me laugh is the implication that the poison-tongued, heavily biased 'Global Warmests' climate change skeptics on this forum should be investigated for covert funding by Big Oil. This is the kind of paranoid, over-the top assertion that manages to totally invert what is actually going on, and tends to discredit itself with no help from me.
      One thing I really would like to investigate is the allegation that Al Gore is a major shareholder, possibly a controlling shareholder, in Occidental Petroleum. If anyone knows more about this I'd be interested to hear more. It's not Exxon Mobil, as I incorrectly mentioned in an earlier post, but apparently Occidental. If this is true, then Gore's hypocrisy is just the tip of an expanding iceberg set to explode with shards that will whizz all over the freezing planet.
       I draw your attention to this article by David Rose in the Daily Mail, 'The Mini Ice Age Starts Here'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242011/DAVID-ROSE-The-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html

Professor Mojib Latif has developed new methods for measuring ocean temperatures 3,000 feet beneath the surface, where the cooling and warming cycles start.
      Note: Robert Felix contends that underwater volcanic activity significantly warms the oceans, that such activity has been increasing in recent years, and that increasing precipitation from the warming oceans will freeze and form snow. He agrees with Latif that we are heading for 30-40 years of planetary cooling, and that an ice age, whether mini or maxi, is quite on the cards.
      Why is that so hard for people to grasp? Surely in a few years we will have a pretty good idea of where the global climate is heading, no amount of fiddling with statistics and dodgy graphs is going to influence that reality, only people's perception of it? I think perception is being actively manipulated on many levels,
not just climate. Nothing new there.

Here's another 'unauthorized, non-peer reviewed' link which gives a different view of certain statements about global warming that are bandied about as cast-iron 'truths' in the media.

http://icecap.us/index.php/go/faqs-and-myths#10

My point all along is that the peer review process is corruptable and a means of controlling information. It can turn what would otherwise be a valid process of scientific inquiry, into something more like a religion where one viewpoint is repeated endlessly and alternative views are ignored or suppressed. We can see this when government organizes 'food advisory panels' staffed with people funded by Monsanto. We can see the 'revolving door' between the UN and the vaccine companies. We can see how special interests always have the financial clout to 'manage' information when it suits them, there is nothing new about this, it's been going on for years, and that's why the media is so full of garbage and propaganda, because they are a fundamental part of this process.

I think recent calls for 'peer to peer' review are a healthy signal in view of the recent Wikipedia scandal. By the way, you can find the article concerning aspects of Wikipedia's integrity and the editing process at wattsupwiththat.com