Global Warming Truth

[ResinRat2]

http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog

Yeah, well I guess the Weather Channel believes that global warming is a hoax as well.

They must be under the influence of BIG OIL (LOL)!

[Cap-Z-ro]

*drags in dead horse and riding crop*

*leaves thread thoroughly entertained*

[sparks]

   Farmers almanac predicted this 50year event.  Very little solar activity.  It aint big oil anymore it is energy cartels.  If you believe that these companies are some kind of conspricy between governments of the world to enslave people that is your choice.  Its more like these are totally stupid people who find some kind of pleasure in looking at pieces of paper with markings on them that says they are rich.  Next step is go out and flaunt it.  Make everyone jealous.  Alienate everyone so you stand out in a crowd of other assholes doing the same shit.  Then after that do the facelift the clone  whatever makes them feel they can get an edge on nature.  Spend a lifetime keeping a certain image afloat.  Bad kharma man just bad kharma.

[Pirate88179]

Cap:

Are you sure it is a dead horse?  Was the horse's condition reviewed by a group of QUALIFIED veterinary professionals?  Do we know for sure that these vets were not working for big oil?

You made a bold statement claiming this horse was dead, yet you did not post sources for this conclusion.  I looked it up on WIKI and it clearly says your horse is not dead.  It also went on to say that a dead horse could not be dragged as you CLAIM to have done.  I have a problem with all of these discrepancies.  Even though I do not understand it, I am confident that big oil is behind this, whatever it is.

Bill

[PaulLowrance]

OK, first you say 99 per cent, now it's 97 per cent of climatologists agree with the data. Which is it?

I never wrote 99%.

when you say I should read Wikipedia for the peer-reviewed facts, I have a problem with that. You say that Lord Monckton is a 'biased British politician'? where is your evidence for that? Beacause he disgrees with your point of view, that makes him 'biased'?

Because he does not deal with facts. He pushes ambiguous claims, which is not an scientific method. Math is a great tool because it gets people to agree on something, rather than arguing forever.

You are asking me to 'prove' that 97% of scientists are lying about the data. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying there is a substantial body of people that fundamentally disagree with your views.

I'm only interested in what scientists say, and over 97% say humanity is the significant cause to global warming. See the exact quote.


I'm done with you until you can show peer reviewed data. I have no further interest in your claims. I've posted the wikipedia links, which contain the references.