Joule Thief replications - not overunity

4Tesla · January 16, 2010, 04:50:54 AM

Quote from: bboj on January 16, 2010, 04:41:51 AM
May I suggest You Pirate and Gadget just perform those measurments and silence-disproof Paul.

Or better yet.. just everyone grow up!

PaulLowrance · January 16, 2010, 09:00:07 AM

Quote from: Mk1 on January 15, 2010, 04:54:08 PM
Paul is just irate , because he tough he could make money with it , but now feel he wasted his time .

Sorry we could not make you rich .

Why tell a lie about me when I've already clarified? Again, you buddy copied a *portion* of a *sentence* from my public statement at my website, gave it a deceitful twist about how I was going to sell other peoples devices, and didn't even provide a link so people could see how he clearly lied. But hey, you would rather lie to help your buddy, huh.

My websites public statement -->

http://globalfreeenergy.info/public-statement/

And proof that I did not edit my public statement like Pirate88179 tries to get people to think -->

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:KouVPJ5ntb0J:globalfreeenergy.info/public-statement/+%22I+start+a+company+to+market+and+SELL+such+machines+to+people+and+companies+who+are%22+site:http://globalfreeenergy.info/&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

The above link is a google server where google caches web pages. Take note at the top of the web page of googles time stamp of Dec 6, 2009 01:56:57 GMT. Thank the Universe for google who saved me from Pirate88179's Libelous acts.

PaulLowrance · January 16, 2010, 09:02:10 AM

Quote from: 4Tesla on January 16, 2010, 04:50:54 AM
Or better yet.. just everyone grow up!

I agree. A war is never good, but they hijacked my thread, and attacked me on a personal level with lies, so I have to defend as they gang up on me.

They can't stand the fact that I tested their claims, which in every case showed less than 100% efficiency. I'm a huge fan of excess energy research, but not false claims to damage this community.

So I'm heading back to the Steorn forum and also continue my Steorn replication today. IMO the Steorn claim is legit. Lets see how long it lasts before someone in this thread attacks again with lies and libelous statements.

WilbyInebriated · January 16, 2010, 11:24:53 AM

Quote from: PaulLowrance on January 16, 2010, 09:02:10 AM
They can't stand the fact that I tested their claims, which in every case showed less than 100% efficiency. I'm a huge fan of excess energy research, but not false claims to damage this community.

your tests, were they peer reviewed? are you suggesting one non peer reviewed test is a scientific conclusion? where can the full data set from your 'test' be reviewed at?

did poynt vet it for you? because if he or milehigh or tk didn't do the vetting... well, need i say more?

PaulLowrance · January 16, 2010, 11:32:30 AM

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on January 16, 2010, 11:24:53 AM
your tests, were they peer reviewed? are you suggesting one non peer reviewed test is a scientific conclusion? where can the full data set from your 'test' be reviewed at?

did poynt vet it for you? because if he or milehigh or tk didn't do the vetting... well, need i say more?

Good point. No peer reviewed because there's nothing to bother the science community over, yet. That's why I took the time to build it and the COP measurements.

btw, I'm not the only person who's take COP measurements of Joule Thief circuits. In every case so far, every tested Joule Thief was less than COP 1, less than 100% efficient.