Joule Thief replications - not overunity

[gadgetmall]

Sterno running a magnet wheel from a torroid is nothing new and really the power he uses is much more higher than some of the experiments Jonnydavro did the first of last year . to me its a simple  Bedini /Jt combo . I made one and its really nothing to get excited about . Of coarse the magnets get cool . they do in all spinning magnet devices due to windchill effect plus most all my magnets feel cold by them selves . its interesting why a magnet is colder than the room temperature . (spinning atoms ). They are fun to play with but its the same old principle to repel a magnet and you spin the wheel . Have fun . If you find something that catches your fancy then by all means pursue it . Thats all i have done.
Paul i know you tried your best to prove me wrong or right .
In a few weeks all the test here and at Alexs house will be complete . The Feedback circuit is really a remarkable device . I may have said that the combination of a simple jt in conjunction with the bcap shows Ou . I never said or ments that the JT in it self is Ou . every one know that . I never ment the bcap itself is ou . but the FACTS are when combined in the right way something out of the ordinary happens . The MAIN thing we are looking at is the ability of the Maxwell bcaps  is to take anomalous hv Spikes (ie static charge) and convert this into real power . this is where the extra energy is coming from . unless you have these spikes then you will not see the effect . I guess one can prove this by running a whimhurst generator and letting the bcap absorb the static and then show the power from the bcap .

Please lets all stop bickering . life is shorter than you know . 2012 is almost here . look at the large quakes killing 100000's of people . there is more to come . Lets get on with the program of solving free energy and there is no use quoting and reposting old news and making a big deal  of it . If anyone want to figure out why this works or not i have a few controller boards left to give away . all i ask is postage and i will mail you one with a link to the parts list .

later

Albert

[WilbyInebriated]

Good point. No peer reviewed because there's nothing to bother the science community over, yet. That's why I took the time to build it and the COP measurements.

btw, I'm not the only person who's take COP measurements of Joule Thief circuits. In every case so far, every tested Joule Thief was less than COP 1, less than 100% efficient.

but you ignored the most important question... where can the full data set from your 'test' be reviewed at? i am really suprised you chose to avoid answering that question of them all, being how you are all for open source and the like.

[PaulLowrance]

Paul i know you tried your best to prove me wrong or right .

Another theory is that I tried my best to find your results.

In a few weeks all the test here and at Alexs house will be complete .

We all look forward to it, but please send it to Stefan. I trust Stefan over the JT gang. 

[PaulLowrance]

but you ignored the most important question... where can the full data set from your 'test' be reviewed at? i am really suprised you chose to avoid answering that question of them all, being how you are all for open source and the like.

What do you mean "where?"  I posted the data. You're more than welcome to come out here and witness the measurements if you want. You want a video? Maybe I should have, but then again people can always doubt that as well. I see no point in your question. If you doubt me, then do the measurements yourself and post them.

[WilbyInebriated]

What do you mean "where?"  I posted the data. You're more than welcome to come out here and witness the measurements if you want. You want a video? Maybe I should have, but then again people can always doubt that as well. I see no point in your question. If you doubt me, then do the measurements yourself and post them.

really? you finally finished that data logger and went the full distance? or is this the 'published data' you refer to from your website?

"Yesterday I tested gadgetmall (Albert) Joule Thief circuit. I used a AAA NiMH 700mAh battery as the source connected to Albert’s circuit, which in turn charges a BCAP0650 ultracapacitor (UC).  The UC started at 1.130 volts. The AA battery was charged. The experiment ended with the AAA at 0.491V, and the UC at 1.313V. This means the Joule Thief circuit charged the UC from 1.130V to 1.313V, for total energy of 134 joules. We know from the previous battery test that the same type of battery, fully charged, made by the same company, a AA 2000mAh NiMH has 6900 joules. Therefore the AAA 700mAh battery should have ~ 2400 joules. This comes to 100% * 134 J / 2400 J = 5.6 % efficient.

Today I adjusted the 10Kohm pot to try and improve the efficiency. This resulted 44% efficient, which is better than yesterdays 5.6% efficiency. I’m not sure if there’s much else to do here."

that's your idea of a conclusive test?