Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Thief replications - not overunity

Started by PaulLowrance, January 12, 2010, 01:42:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

PaulLowrance

Hi,

First, I firmly believe in cop>1 research, but IMO the Joule Thief is nothing but a massive distraction from legit research. That's my firm opinion.

Anyhow, I should have posted this. I and numerous others have taken the time to replicate various Joule Thief claims, and all of the claims were well below 100% efficiency. Here's my tests -->

44% efficiency:
http://globalfreeenergy.info/2009/12/11/joule-thief-tested/


Also some people thought the Ultracapacitors were over unity, but they were not -->

Part number BCAP0650 (650 farads) 92% efficient:
http://globalfreeenergy.info/2009/12/08/ultracapacitor-experiment/



PaulLowrance

Photos of my Joule Thief. Note, these photos were taken after the capacitor was removed from the circuit. The capacitor that was in the circuit was the exact value that gadgetmall used. Furthermore, I tried various size capacitors, including a variable capacitor. The highest efficiency was obtained without a capacitor.

innovation_station

i will not get into it with you paul ...

regards


YOU SIR ARE VERRY WRONG! 

H

To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!

jeanna

Quote from: PaulLowrance on January 12, 2010, 01:42:59 PM
Hi,

First, I firmly believe in cop>1 research, but IMO the Joule Thief is nothing but a massive distraction from legit research. That's my firm opinion.

Anyhow, I should have posted this. I and numerous others have taken the time to replicate various Joule Thief claims, and all of the claims were well below 100% efficiency. Here's my tests -->

....
Hi Paul,
I am proud that I am working with non legit systems.

I live in a box as everyone else, but it pleases me greatly to hear that my box is not the same as the legit box.

with respect,
jeanna

jadaro2600

Blah Blah Blah...

I really do wish more people would post more math with their claims though.  It should be assumed the efficiency is below 100% unless otherwise proven.

I also wish those claiming any different would prove it once and for all.