H/h "puzzle"...

[iacob alex]

  ...can be a simple way to think and hope,about the possibility to imagine a PM.

     Here we have:

     -"h" is the long-short arm difference in a classical design (with two equal masses).

     -"H" is the free fall.

     And now,a simple  "puzzle"/problem :...if "h" =constant ,but "H" is ever increasing ?!

     If we have a starting  logical "key" for PM,there will be a hope,and a faith ,maybe...

         All the best! / Alex   

[iacob alex]

.....can be a simple bewildering,apparently perplexing question of a possible PM,as a "black box".

      The input ,proportional with "h" (arm difference for a long arm-short arm design,with two equally masses ),is in fact a small unbalance.

      The output,proportional with "H" (H>>h) ,becomes a big unbalance,due to a long free gravity fall (v=g*t).

       If we introduce the feedback...we can play a mechanical oscillator.

             All the best! / Alex

[iacob alex]

....can be seen as an interesting challenge,if "H" (the free fall of the torque difference ) is enough big ,and "h" (the "remake" of the long arm-short arm difference) is enough small.

   More,we can take into account the case,when "h"=constant  and "H" is ever increasing.

   The prime line design,can be imagined,not as a many small steps/many spokes,"trip" around the fulcrum,or as a qusi-static "asymmetric wheel arabesque"...

   The dynamics depends on a pulsatory,repetitive (two steps only/one big-the free fall,one small-the "remake" ) conception,as a cascade,avalanche of gravity power...this implies a free fall as great as possible...so ,two arms,only.

    All the best! / Alex

[FreeEnergy]