All of Stanley Meyer's Equipment FOUND Including Dune Buggy! (Videos Here)

[MarkE]

I have already said.

I am ready to collaborate if somebody wants to make an 18 cell tube.

6 sets, triple tube.

as per Stephen Meyers.

The weak and incompetents argue , the strong and real experimenters make things.

What is the null hypothesis that you intend to falsify?  If you have an exact specification of a device that Meyer built, then the null hypothesis can be that the device worked as claimed when constructed to the specifications that you have.  If you do not have such specifications, then you will need to select a different null hypothesis to falsify.  That could be for example:  "Electrolysis cannot deliver more energy out than in."  You can then attempt to build a unit with whatever information that you have in hopes that you will be able to demonstrate over unity and therefore falsify the null hypothesis.

[MarkE]

@Mark E:
It was a simple yes or no question.  I didn't ask for your views on electrolysis, claims you were making or for a speech on something you have posted like salt and pepper all the way through this forum.  We all have your rant on claims and who is responsible for them as I noted earlier.


But thank you for the actual "no" response.

Are you really complaining that I explained my answer?  Do you disagree with the notion that it is up to those who make extraordinary claims to prove their claims?  Why do you consider expressing the position that it is their responsibility to be a rant?  Whose responsibility could it possibly be?  And why do you think that?

[Cap-Z-ro]

I was always taught to never answer a question with a question.

I guess because it wood make e person look evasive.

Regards...

[ARMCORTEX]

MarkE, let somebody build a Stephen Meyers design and waste his money.

I would like an old rich retired guy with Hydrogen fixation to continue the legacy of O wise Dankie.

[chessnyt]

Are you really complaining that I explained my answer?  Do you disagree with the notion that it is up to those who make extraordinary claims to prove their claims?  Why do you consider expressing the position that it is their responsibility to be a rant?  Whose responsibility could it possibly be?  And why do you think that?

Well Mark, thank you for asking my opinion.  Here it is.  You have already "explained yourself" quite thoroughly throughout various threads you have posted in here on this forum.  I am sure there is no clarity needed concerning your views on responsibility.  I consider your answer a "rant" when it appears throughout a thread over and over again.  Check this thread.  Perhaps you are unaware that you repeat yourself again, again and still again (redundancy).


Whose responsibility is it to prove "extraordinary claims"?  It is obviously the claimant, as you have repeated over and over again (which most should know by now by heart).  Do I believe this is correct?  YES, it should go without saying.