All of Stanley Meyer's Equipment FOUND Including Dune Buggy! (Videos Here)

[Poit]

We have thousands of examples of ordinary electrolysis including careful measurements that confirm the Faraday limit.  Someone such as Stanley Meyer or anyone else who wishes to promote a claim of electrolysis at better than the Faraday limit bears the burden of providing strong evidence for their claim that contradicts so much established experience.  Replication is important evidence needed to support extraordinary claims.  The burden of such evidence falls on the claimant.  Since I do not make Stan Meyer's extraordinary claims I do not bear such a burden.

Couldn't of worded it better my self. As Carl Sagan once said "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"

It is NOT an extraordinary claim to NOT have OU, so why are we always asked to disprove others extraordinary claims? its funny huh

It would be like saying that the earth is square and its up to everyone else to disprove it, but not me to prove it, its just insane

[chessnyt]

We have thousands of examples of ordinary electrolysis including careful measurements that confirm the Faraday limit.  Someone such as Stanley Meyer or anyone else who wishes to promote a claim of electrolysis at better than the Faraday limit bears the burden of providing strong evidence for their claim that contradicts so much established experience.  Replication is important evidence needed to support extraordinary claims.  The burden of such evidence falls on the claimant.  Since I do not make Stan Meyer's extraordinary claims I do not bear such a burden.

I asked the question to find out if you had attempted specifically to replicate Stan Meyer's demo cell.  You still haven't answered the question.  The question was way too technical in nature for you.  I am very sorry I have overestimated your ability to comprehend simple questions.  My bad.  Let me ask you in simpler terms then.


Have you ever bought stainless steel tubes (a total of 18) and arranged them (housed them) in a plastic tube so as to match the fuel cell that Stanley Meyer made for demonstration purposes?   Now if you have, could you show your replication?

[MarkE]

I asked the question to find out if you had attempted specifically to replicate Stan Meyer's demo cell.  You still haven't answered the question.  The question was way too technical in nature for you.  I am very sorry I have overestimated your ability to comprehend simple questions.  My bad.  Let me ask you in simpler terms then.

I thought I made it clear why there has never been any reason that I or anyone else who adheres to the well demonstrated Faraday limit should undertake such an endeavor.  I thought that I made it clear that when we have a strong body of evidence backing our current understanding, that it is up to someone who challenges that understanding to supply strong evidence.  If you did not find that a clear enough expression of "No", then I apologize for any confusion.

Have you ever bought stainless steel tubes (a total of 18) and arranged them (housed them) in a plastic tube so as to match the fuel cell that Stanley Meyer made for demonstration purposes?   Now if you have, could you show your replication?

No, I have not.  As I have explained, there was never any reason that I should. Electrolysis is well understood and documented. 

[ARMCORTEX]

I have already said.

I am ready to collaborate if somebody wants to make an 18 cell tube.

6 sets, triple tube.

as per Stephen Meyers.

The weak and incompetents argue , the strong and real experimenters make things.

So many buttheads on the net these days, arguing over this and that and politics.

O wise Dankie, was on the right track.

Will you continue his work and put the work in yes or no ?

If no then STFU.

[chessnyt]

@Mark E:
It was a simple yes or no question.  I didn't ask for your views on electrolysis, claims you were making or for a speech on something you have posted like salt and pepper all the way through this forum.  We all have your rant on claims and who is responsible for them as I noted earlier.


But thank you for the actual "no" response.