Oh, That Adolph...Cheeky

[the_big_m_in_ok]

Cap-Z-ro said:

I've heard it said that there are various blood lines of varying importance, and that the A of Charles would have been the DNA of relevance to be continued...which would seem to suport that line of reasoning.

I think, as stated elsewhere in this thread, Princess Diana wasn't completely 'in' with the British royal family, since she was significantly Irish in the same vein as President JFK.  She wasn't necessarily going to go along with the BS that others in the royal family were promoting.

Maybe its like passing on the family business to them.

A lot of people are like that.  Make money at all costs, right?

Who knows what wacky thoughts and concepts are housed within those inbred heads of theirs.

Well, to be fair(read: devil's advocate) my parents were pretty closely related in their ancestors from the British Isles.  Their ethnic minorities were something drastically different---and that set them apart, genetically.

--Lee

[Cap-Z-ro]

My parents were pretty closely related in their ancestors from Scotland...we weren't recycling evil as a lone theme though.

*adjusts kilt*

I think that makes difference.

Regards...

[the_big_m_in_ok]

My parents were pretty closely related in their ancestors from Scotland...we weren't recycling evil as a lone theme though.

My Mom was noticeably Scottish herself.  We're ethnically related.
As for the Scottish people, a Native American shaman, whose original Cherokee ancestors lived in the prehistoric lands of Labrador/Newfoundland(the northernmost area where the Cherokee people ever lived thousands of years ago), told me the Scots who immigrated from the Old Country were matrilineal in their traditional culture---like the Cherokee.  He thought that that was much better than the English, who arrived about the same time.  Princess Di may have had that mindset as well.  It was her overall ethnic group.  I also think the same way.  The Fascist reptoids can go to he11!

*adjusts kilt*
I think that makes difference.

I agree. The Scottish are different.  Especially the natives of the Faeroe and New Hebrides islands.  Their DNA is something different than the rest of Scotland.  Maybe they're descended from the prehistoric natives?  But, they are also partly Norwegian/Danish from the Vikings.

--Lee

[Cap-Z-ro]

Freemasonry also got its start in Scotland from what i've read...early alien abduction contactees reported their language sounded like gaelic.

You're closing in on me Lee...my ancestry originated from the Hebrides.

*takes another bite of haggis*

Regards...

[the_big_m_in_ok]

Freemasonry also got its start in Scotland from what i've read...early alien abductee contactees reported their language sounded like gaelic.

Right.  I'm not surprised.  Here's some more conspiracy:
There's a peculiar circular tower in New England that's unlike anything else in America.  The local native tribe maintains the tower was built before Columbus arrived by red-headed men with green eyes.  Templars?  Looking for a better place for the Holy Grail than Scotland?
I believe the tribe.  I'm Scottish and Native American from a tribe related to them.

You're closing in on me Lee...my ancestry originated from the Hebrides.
*takes another bite of haggis*
Regards...

My Mom was derived from the immigrant James Haggart from Dundee.  The family Haggart is a Sept of Clan Ross.  Highlanders from the Northern hills.  I am closing in on you.

--Lee