Perendev shows his motor to the public in May 2006

[Clarky]

Cool, good to know. Thanks for that Omnibus 

[Liberty]

Perendev electromagnetic motor generator announcement article.  It sounds like an electromagnetic motor that starts on battery and then when the generator starts, it is then self running.

Here is the web site that has the article:  http://pesn.com/2006/03/22/9600252_Perendev_electromagnetic_motor/

[Omnibus]

The article you?re citing is written by Sterling D. Allan. However, I?m finding out that Sterling D. Allan is an unreliable source of information. Of what I?ve read on the web he is some kind of disgruntled customer of Brady?s motor who has tried to present himself as his associate which he is not. Once turned down by Brady he has tried unsuccessfully to replicate Brady?s motor and the lack of success has left him obviously very bitter. Thus, later, he?s been  attacking Brady in a devious way by turning himself into a reporter for the device, following its every step, sounding objective but dropping here and there, as if by chance, subtle criticism. Indeed, from the very beginning of this particular text one meets the completely uncalled-for characterization of Brady as belonging to some imagined by Sterling D. Allan ?fringe world of free energy?. This subtle attack continues by creating the impression that Brady?s motor, although probably something worthwhile, is not a self-sustaining device. This is the important impression which Stering D. Allan aims to create despite covering himself by saying in passing that ?once running it provides enough energy to run under its own power?.

I have not seen the motor, don?t know whether it works or not as a self-sustaining device and cannot by any means be considered as an advocate of Brady and his motor. However, before Brady presents his invention it is best that critics such as Sterling D. Allan restrain from reporting about the device in view of the negative burden they already have due to their unsuccessful attempts to associate themselves with Brady.

[Liberty]

Perhaps skepticism is a healthy thing about a device until a reason or proof is given to solidly believe that the device actually performs at least close to what is claimed. Perhaps the 'reputable test company' could release the test results now for this audience to see??  It seems that many 'claims'  in the free energy area seem to never materialize due to over optimistic euphoria (which is understandable from an inventor) before the actual proof is there for all to see...  I certainly hope that we can all buy an electro-magnetic motor (with magnets in the motor) and couple it to a generator or alternator and have it perform over unity!  Sounds great to me.  Looking forward to the analysis of the test results and a new power source for cars and houses.

[Omnibus]

Healthy skepticism is a good thing, of course. It is in abundance, however, and shouldn?t be a matter of concern. Besides, I wouldn?t call healthy the skepticism of someone who has an ax to grind.

Also, a good thing about a working self-sustaining device is that you don?t need a ?reputable company? or someone in authority to tell you it?s viable. Let, say, Wesley Snyder place his device on a table, suspended on a stand to have it rotate without anyone holding it and show us a video of it. That?ll do.