Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

Is this what the Almighty has in mind for me?

Post on the Internet as if I were writing my diary.
Ignore all comments from naysayers and insulters.
Have solid record for the scientific community who will examine every word under the microscope in the near future.
Enjoy the spa, the swimming in the heated pool and the laughter of the kids.

Bless the Almighty.

[Poit]

Forget about weapons of mass destruction..... ltseung888 brings to the table weapons of mass distraction.

[chrisC]

At the Irving Senior Center â€" Lakeview

...
Mr. L: “That is true.  You need much practice and dry runs before presenting in Stockholm.  Is that your goal?”
...

I strongly advise you to check into this place  before you receive your Nobel prize in Physics?

http://www.healthcare.uci.edu/pm.asp . They need authentic test cases. It's all good!

cheers
chrisC

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

WTF ? This is an OU topic or a comic topic ? What about the main subject: " Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets" ?
Kunel Patent is a pulsed DC transformer, but I have a question here what about Lenz Law in this case. Several months ago I have theorised a pulsed DC transfomer that draw energy from magnetics fields of a magnet (after research I have saw this devices has already invented (Kunel Patent). So the theory is simple: the magnet provide a flux in the iron bar, the control coil pulse and repel the magnet (but the magnet can move away he is glued) when the control coil is switch off, the magnet restore the flux in the iron bar inducing an EMF in the receiver coils, Lenz Law of the receiver coils apply to the magnet not control coil. What do you think about this theory ? In another design I think you can replace the magnet by a DC Bias coil, and close the loop in form of a toroid, like a TPU !!!

Edit: Sorry for the large image that deform the forum...

[ltseung888]

Extending the “resonance leading-out kinetic energy of gases theory” to solids

For any hypothesis to become a theory and be placed in textbooks for all future generations to study, we need to stretch it to the very limits.

It is very logical to propose that the pulsing vibration of the sound waves “induces a more ordered motion” of the moving gas molecules.  This ordered action leads-out the kinetic energy already present in the gas molecules.  Thus two or more tuning forks in resonance or in sympathetic vibration sound louder and last longer because of the extra lead-out or bring-in energy.

How about stretching this theory to solids?  Solid molecules are more rigidly bound to one another.  If we push a solid so that it acquires a velocity v, all molecules must acquire this velocity v.  If we pull it, the same happens.  Thus in physics, a pulling or pushing force on a solid is regarded as identical (at least in its mathematical treatment).

We also know that the molecules in solids are not stationary.  They vibrate in all directions and that phenomenon is exhibited as heat.  When a sound wave passes through a solid, can it “induce some ordered motion” to these random vibrations?

If so, can the more ordered motion lead-out or bring-in some of the randomly vibrating energy into the system?  If so, the lead-out or bring-in energy theory is still applicable to sound waves passing through solids.  Will the resonance effect be present?  Does the different length of tuning forks or vibrating strings or musical rods demonstrate such resonance?

The Almighty cannot be wrong.  Just follow His path.  I am now sure that my hypothesis on sound, resonance and bringing-in of molecular motion energy is correct.  In gases, the energy is the familiar kinetic energy of gas molecules.  In solids, the energy is the familiar vibration energy commonly known as heat.  What a revelation!

@Observer, I fully support your resonating the acoustic transformer.  That experiment will become a “must study” in future physics courses.