Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[Poit]

I wonder who will do the honors of replacing the heads in the pictures above with clowns. haha

[rave154]

got to love the board in the background with "jesus" & "jehovah & "Elohim" on it....

i wonder how many of the people there ACTUALLY KNOW what Elohim means?

[ltseung888]

Thank you for responding: I believe also some energy is pumped somewhere. In the many story FE devices have common parts like: they cooling down (VTA), sometimes gravitational/giroscopical anomaly (TPU), using coils and caps, pulsed, biased DC, feeded with AC, plays with reluctance (BITT), LC resonnance (Rotoverter and Transverter), etc... I don't know if those theories/effects are true or not, but the main problem is the lack of information, misinterpretation of effect (confound with conventional effect), etc... I have browsed the whole internet and this forum, I have seen many pages, but no one is able to replicate devices. What I have never saw a self-looping devices, if FE exist self-looping is just a formality even with a COP 1.1 !!!
I believe in FE devices but I'am very skeptical, can you "self-loop" your FLEET ? I have read you have achieved COP 10, no ?

Let me break your post into several sections to provide more clear answers.

1.   Have my FLEET prototype achieved COP greater than 1?

The answer is a definite yes.  I have 9 FLEET prototypes in my possession in USA that can demonstrate this effect.  More can be produced if needed.  In the workshop done at Hong Kong University in Oct 2010, one of the students, Felix, produced a FLEET prototype with COP > 200.  If you have or have access to two oscilloscopes, a data logger, a DC power supply, a signal generator, you can replicate the development.  If you are only interested in double checking the results and have two oscilloscopes, I can send you one of the working prototypes.  Please read the earlier posts with the two oscilloscope shot photos.

2.   If COP were 1.1, will it be easy to do self-looping?

From my own experiments on FLEET, this is not easy.  FLEET depends on matching the LCR resonance of the primary and the secondary circuits with the toroid.  The resonance effect is load dependent.  If you use a battery as the starting and the maintaining power source, the battery itself becomes part of the LCR circuit.  The best tuning I achieved was a 30 second continued lighting of a LED after the battery was removed.  There could be arguments that the continued lighting was due to capacitors storing some electricity.

3.   You believe some energy is pumped somewhere.  Is this belief justified?

You probably have read my numerous posts on lead-out or bring-in energy from the environment.  The bring-in energy can be the kinetic energy of gas molecules, the vibration energy of solid molecules, gravitational energy and electron motion energy.  The discussion on resonance with two or more tuning forks clearly indicated that there must be external energy coming into the system.  Two or more identical tuning forks sound louder and last longer than one when only one is struck..

To conclude, if you can have access to two oscilloscopes and is willing to do an open verification experiment with FLEET, I shall be willing to send you one of the working FLEET prototypes.  You may keep that as a Christmas Present.  We can define the exact testing procedure in this Forum.  You are strongly encouraged to work with a University or a Research Organization to do the verification.

You (or any one else reading this post) have a chance to test a working lead-out energy FLEET.  The theory is that at resonance, external energy can be brought-into the system.  The existing technique from me is to use two oscilloscopes to conclusively measure and compare the Instantaneous Output Power with the Instantaneous Input Power.

I discourage building a prototype as an individual from instructions on the Internet.  In the Hong Kong University workshop, we found that different participants got different results.  The results range from COP < 1 to COP > 200.  They received the same instructions, used the same material, had the same testing equipment and sat next to one another.  Tuning for resonance is still very tricky.  Slight departure from the resonance condition or frequency will destroy any overunity effects.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited (Hong Kong)

[ltseung888]

Reply to an email from a reputable company in UK

Dear Sirs,
Our company in the UK is involved in the supply of affordable steel frame homes imported from China to both the UK and European housing markets and we are naturally concerned with the major issue of affordable energy in this context. Our clients are major housing bodies and developers and we are also in discussions with Government departments in this field.
We are constantly being reminded of the need for electricity supply that is affordable to most families in the UK and further afield indeed the UK currently has in excess of 4.5 million households in ' fuel poverty ' and with increasing costs of electricity and gas, it is forecast that most households in the country will be paying approximately £ 2,500 per annum for their energy supplies in the next 10 years. As we know there are many ' solutions ' to this problem available on the market e.g. solar energy, air and ground source pumps etc. all of which can make a contribution but at a cost which many people cannot afford and in many instances is not cost effective.
I have spent some considerable time researching alternative technologies in response to this crisis and although I must confess my knowledge of energy production in your specialised field is very limited indeed, I have nonetheless identified the possibilities associated with your methods as potentially the answer to many of these pressing issues. In the humble opinion of myself and my co directors we believe your technology and expertise offers many advantages to the wider world.
Having read the details of your 5kW electricity generator on the website of http://peswiki.com and based on the quoted information you appear to be at the point of production, I should wish to pose some questions if I may although for reasons stated previously not of a highly technical nature.
Firstly can you advise the anticipated savings in electricity output to an average household, secondly is the technology compatible with UK electricity system, thirdly what is considered to be the appropriate start up mechanism / system to initiate operation of the unit, fourthly when you mention mass production can you advise of capacity, fifthly does the technology require a back up system or would the national grid be considered as such and lastly is there any follow up maintenance requirement for the unit.
As mentioned in the above website your team is seeking a marketing partner and I should like to know if this requirement has been fulfilled in the UK and Europe, if not we would be happy to enter into discussions on this point at the earliest opportunity.
In the course of my research I have uncovered some resistance to this technology from those parties with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo however, having studied the implications and advantages of your technology we believe strongly that this resistance can be overcome as the elements and arguments in favour appear so powerful.
In conclusion, may I say on behalf of my company we are deeply impressed with your technological advancements, principals and ambitions and would welcome the opportunity to develop these further in association with yourselves and your team.
I look forward to your early reply
Kind Regards
John O'Mahony
Sales & Operations Director
CSIBA Europe Ltd
Tel / Fax: + 44 (0)1333 450329
Email: enquiries@csibaeurope.co.uk
www.csibaeurope.co.uk

Dear Mr. John O’Mahony,


Please read my post at:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg266584#msg266584

Mr. Wang would like all requests for information (technical or business) to be directed to him via his email address.  There are many sensitive issues as at one time he was funded by the Chinese Government and the State Electricity Companies.

You may be interested in the FLEET technology also.  FLEET stands for Forever Lead-out Electromagnetic Energy Transformer.  Both the Wang generator and FLEET belong to the class of Lead-out or Bring-in Energy Machines.  The Wang generator uses coupling of ferro-liquid and permanent magnets to lead-out the electron motion energy.  FLEET uses Joule Thief and LCR circuits to resonate toroids to lead-out the electron motion energy of the trillions of electrons in the surrounding environment.

The FLEET technology is at the stage of verification.  If you are interested, your Company may help us in doing a commercial verification.  Academic verification has already started and is expected to take many months.  Please read my post at:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg266916#msg266916

As far as I am aware, there are at least thirteen teams in Hong Kong and China working on the FLEET technology and related products.  Most of them are keeping their progress confidential until their product is ready for the Market.

Now to your questions:

Firstly can you advise the anticipated savings in electricity output to an average household?

The monthly electricity bill is zero.  The 5 KW Wang or the FLEET units are capable of generating that amount 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.  If the household requires more, they can have two or more units.  I have no idea of the selling price of a Wang or FLEET unit but the material and manufacturing cost is likely to be less than USD1,000.

Secondly
is the technology compatible with UK electricity system?

The existing technology is capable of converting the output of the Wang or the FLEET units to different AC or DC voltages at 50 or 60 Hertz.  We expect existing electrical appliances can draw power from such units with no difficulty.   This is an important area for the development team.  Full information will be available at product rollout.  (If your Company participates in the early tests, you will have reports from your own engineers.)

Thirdly what is considered to be the appropriate start up mechanism / system to initiate operation of the unit?

The present thought is to use the existing national grid as start up and back up.  Technologically, the Wang generator can start just by turning the shaft by hand in the laboratory.  The FLEET unit can start and maintain its operation with a rechargeable AA battery.  Once started, that AA battery can even be removed.  (You can test this mechanism in the early tests.)

Fourthly when you mention mass production can you advise of capacity?
This is a more difficult question to answer.  You may already know that there are other competing technologies that claim to bring-in energy from the environment.  Google Steven Mark TPU as an example.  I personally believe that I am not the inventor.  God is working his Miracles through me.  Thus I seek no financial or other rewards.  My information is free to benefit the World.

This is also the reason that I have not received any Venture Funding (or likely to receive any).  The other teams work differently than me and some are known to have received significant funding.

Email Wang directly.  He is likely to have a different answer.

Fifthly does the technology require a back up system or would the national grid be considered as such?

You have the correct answer.

Lastly is there any follow up maintenance requirement for the unit?

Technically, the Wang or the FLEET units should have a life similar to that of a reliable refrigerator.   Ten years or more should not be a problem.  Some engineers are even talking about having dual units as a standard.  If the primary unit fails, the secondary will automatically take over.  At the same time, an alert message will be displayed to the home owner and a maintenance message will be sent to the maintaining Company automatically.

If your Company is interested in an early test, please email me or post your reply directly in the overunity.com forum.

Yours truly,
Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[rave154]

The monthly electricity bill is zero.  The 5 KW Wang or the FLEET units are capable of generating that amount 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.  If the household requires more, they can have two or more units.  I have no idea of the selling price of a Wang or FLEET unit but the material and manufacturing cost is likely to be less than USD1,000.

holy crap..........what a bunch of horse shit......there is no 5KW "device" !!

as for this mr mahoney ( assuming hes real )...and leading him on to think that an installable 5KW device is just around the corner....... you must must really have some screws loose tseung......i think my early comments referring to you as Walter Mitty.....are proving more & more accurate