Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[PhysicsProfessor]

  In my first post on this forum, I will provide a very brief introduction.

  I am a full Professor of Physics, Emeritus, with approximately 60 peer-reviewed publications so far.  I have published as first author more than once in both Nature and Physical Review Letters, among other notable journals.

  I have requested of Lawrence Tseung one of his prototypes for testing, and he has agreed.
I will let the forum know when I have received a prototype, and I expect to disclose the results -- when the tests are complete.  Whether I disclose results on this forum or not remains to be decided; in general, I prefer to use peer-reviewed publications.
 

  Now, the ad hominem-type attacks by some of you on the forum, in particular on this thread, seem most unscientific and even childish to me.  Lawrence has developed what he claims are working prototypes and has agreed to allow these to be tested -- why don't you naysayers wait until the tests are completed and stop your mocking?

[Omnibus]

  In my first post on this forum, I will provide a very brief introduction.

  I am a full Professor of Physics, Emeritus, with approximately 60 peer-reviewed publications so far.  I have published as first author more than once in both Nature and Physical Review Letters, among other notable journals.

  I have requested of Lawrence Tseung one of his prototypes for testing, and he has agreed.
I will let the forum know when I have received a prototype, and I expect to disclose the results -- when the tests are complete.  Whether I disclose results on this forum or not remains to be decided; in general, I prefer to use peer-reviewed publications.
 

  Now, the ad hominem-type attacks by some of you on the forum, in particular on this thread, seem most unscientific and even childish to me.  Lawrence has developed what he claims are working prototypes and has agreed to allow these to be tested -- why don't you naysayers wait until the tests are completed and stop your mocking?

That's quite commendable to have colleagues interested in the area of OU. It's such a rarity that is almost unbelievable to have an academic show interest in it. Furthermore, the intention to publish the results in the peer-reviewed literature is exactly the way to go. I'd like ro ask you, however, a few questions in this regard. First, how do you at all expect results, even if most founded and rigorous, to be published in journals such as Nature and/or PRL when these and other maintream journals will return any text implying violation of COE without even sending it to referees? On the other hand, I'd be curious to know your opinion as to the use for publishing negative results. Negative results are trivial, they are expected by the mainstream and won't be a contribution to science at all. So, why bother? 

As for the bashing, it stems from the unwillingness of the researcher to proceed along the lines accepted in science which include openness in dissemination of the research, consideration for the critics and understanding that ensuring conditions for the results to be reproduced by others is crucial for any scientific claim. Many, including the person in question, behave as tradesmen, sellers, fund raising agents and so on about something that has not even an inkling of proof, let alone that even if there were proof such behavior is unscientific and deservedly invokes derisive remarks. 

[tagor]

  In my first post on this forum, I will provide a very brief introduction.

  I am a full Professor of Physics, Emeritus, with approximately 60 peer-reviewed publications so far.  I have published as first author more than once in both Nature and Physical Review Letters, among other notable journals.

  I have requested of Lawrence Tseung one of his prototypes for testing, and he has agreed.
I will let the forum know when I have received a prototype, and I expect to disclose the results -- when the tests are complete.  Whether I disclose results on this forum or not remains to be decided; in general, I prefer to use peer-reviewed publications.
 

  Now, the ad hominem-type attacks by some of you on the forum, in particular on this thread, seem most unscientific and even childish to me.  Lawrence has developed what he claims are working prototypes and has agreed to allow these to be tested -- why don't you naysayers wait until the tests are completed and stop your mocking?

are you the " well-known professors "  ?

if so , we are waiting for your tests results

[XS-NRG]

  In my first post on this forum, I will provide a very brief introduction.

  I am a full Professor of Physics, Emeritus, with approximately 60 peer-reviewed publications so far.  I have published as first author more than once in both Nature and Physical Review Letters, among other notable journals.

  I have requested of Lawrence Tseung one of his prototypes for testing, and he has agreed.
I will let the forum know when I have received a prototype, and I expect to disclose the results -- when the tests are complete.  Whether I disclose results on this forum or not remains to be decided; in general, I prefer to use peer-reviewed publications.
 

  Now, the ad hominem-type attacks by some of you on the forum, in particular on this thread, seem most unscientific and even childish to me.  Lawrence has developed what he claims are working prototypes and has agreed to allow these to be tested -- why don't you naysayers wait until the tests are completed and stop your mocking?

You are no professor!!
YOU ARE THE CLOWN !!!

[chrisC]

  In my first post on this forum, I will provide a very brief introduction.

  I am a full Professor of Physics, Emeritus, with approximately 60 peer-reviewed publications so far.  ...

I see. I'm impressed indeed. Let's see, I think you're referring to clowning technology? Is Tseung your student or your clone? Welcome to the circus.

cheers
chrisC