Wackjob Gates Proposes and (implicitly) admits to practicing genocide

[Cap-Z-ro]

"Bill Gates proposes and (implicity) admits to practicing genocide"

" Bill Gates told a recent TED conference that vaccines need to be used to reduce world population figures in order to solve global warming and lower CO2 emissions.
Stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion), we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.”

This is surely a huge story that should be all over the mainstream media. "

More here...

http://kevboyle.blogspot.com/2010/03/bill-gates-proposes-and-implicity.html


Regards...

[jadaro2600]

SO, I wonder if his philanthropic throws into the Gates foundation were preemptive or postoperative.

[utilitarian]

OK, you realize he is talking about reducing the population growth, not reducing the population?  The figure he wants to reduce is the 9 billion projected population, not the current 6 billion actual.  So there is no talk of actually killing anyone.

If you have effective vaccines, you give children higher probability to grow to adulthood, and thereby give parents less incentive to squirt out a ton of kids (hoping 2 out of 5 will live on).

[infringer]

Utilitarian correcet! Do not take this out of context folks I am sure bill gates is far from the thought of killing everyone...

Without the millions he would have been a nobody.

Its a crazy deal but we do need to practice a little smarter birthing and family planning practices.

I choose not to have kids one of my reasons is there is enough people out there in need of care the others well I could go on but that is besides the issue at hand.

There should be limit to the number of kids one couple is allowed to have and if you get married again or one of them dies they allow you another just to keep things in perspective. I think we could do things like reforestation and such though to support a larger population the technology is available it just needs to be applied if we make efforts twords this I am all for having a brady bunch but we have some issues currently that are not going to fix themselves and more people may make it worse or may make it better it might be that one extra person that has the solution to something big like the energy crisis I dunno but at current state I choose not to have kids and wish for others not to be forced into the majority vote many folks are coaxed into starting a family by there family this is not the way forward.

Choice remains lets make smart choices though when you have a child you are bringing it into the world of turmoil currently so think think think list your pros and cons before forging ahead and plan for the worst.

[jadaro2600]

Silliness.  Limiting the number of children a couple may have has led to some of the most inhumane treatments for punishing those who violate this.

And imagine what a government might do with the extra child.

And after they've castrated one parent and those children die in some tragedy, I suppose the kid will be replaced by one of the extras from another family.

Very strange this idea.

_ _ _ _ _ _

You want to help the problem: propose some non-restrictive means, ..for each child some socialistic / communitarian effort be made ( plant ten trees, twenty even )  ...  make donations to sustainable living studies or ownership of bonds ..beyond that proposed limit.

but then, your kids appear to be tied to bonds - that's likely worse than one might imagine   .."Title pawn your child"?

Just teach people that raising 7 kids in poverty is unreasonable; their expectations from the government should be considered.  The 5 baby's daddies - wtf are they doing?