LaFonte Group can turn off permanent magnet without work

[Butch LaFonte]

Larry, Are you saying you got over 200% overunity at times or am I reading it wrong.
Butch

Larry, i just put my glasses on, I see it's .207
Sorry,
Butch

[LarryC]

Larry, i just put my glasses on, I see it's .207

Hi Butch,

Don't expect any OU with a cheap AC induction motor as prime mover, it is only good at detecting increases or decreases in rotor torque.

Actually, the results are somewhat confusing to me. The switcher has a small advantage, but the input watts, with toroid, no caps, went up as the ohms increased. The input watts, with no toroid, no caps, went down as the ohms increased. Maybe Gyula or others have some insight.

Regards, Larry 

[Blainiac]

I can't help but still be amazed by this.  I love how the newest design just happens to look like an infinity symbol.   

So basically modifying the original design by making the outer part more susceptible to flux eliminates the need for the air gaps...  That's so cool.  I just modified my simulation and everything looks great.  Again, I'm amazed at how you guys think of these awesome ideas.

[phoneboy]

Hello all, been following the thread and this just keeps getting better, had a suggestion pertaining to the rotor magnet, I'm working on something different but figured this could probably work with what you're doing.  In addition to making the flux path out of a ferromagnetic/epoxy mix also make your magnet out of epoxy.  Alinco, ferrite, & neos are just compressed/sintered magnetized powder. What if you took a c8 ceramic or a neo with the nickel coating removed and ground them into a fine powder, placed the powder in a form with epoxy, and placed magnets around the form so the particles aligned while curing, you could make whatever shape you needed for some small air gaps.

[LarryC]

Larry, i just put my glasses on, I see it's .207

Just noticed that my format is wrong. Since I had a % sign in the title, it should have been 20.7

Regards, Larry