Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Fibonacci, platonic solids and Vortex coils

Started by Mk1, March 09, 2010, 10:39:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

wattsup

@Mk1

How high can you go in pulse frequency?

Mk1

Quote from: wattsup on April 10, 2010, 07:38:46 PM
@Mk1

How high can you go in pulse frequency?

Unfortunately i have no means of knowing , no scope or meter worth shit , sorry  :-[.


@all

I will have new movies soon , small one but still real interesting ... 

ElectricGoose

Quote from: Mk1 on April 09, 2010, 11:30:13 PM
@all

I am almost there !

Two more wire to go !

I followed the same steps from last page , i forgot to mention to put double sided tape between layers...

Mark

Nice job Mark!

My jig is a little bit different.  You go crosseyed with this Rodin type winding after awhile trying to keep track of all the layers  :o

From your pic it seems you have too many leads?  Are you still winding a bifilar coil like the original (missing every second peg for the 2nd bifilar wire?  I ask because I thought somewhere along the way you stopped doing that and you were only winding one wire 'per side' of the pickup coil?

E-Goose

Mk1

Quote from: ElectricGoose on April 10, 2010, 10:44:48 PM
Nice job Mark!

My jig is a little bit different.  You go crosseyed with this Rodin type winding after awhile trying to keep track of all the layers  :o

From your pic it seems you have too many leads?  Are you still winding a bifilar coil like the original (missing every second peg for the 2nd bifilar wire?  I ask because I thought somewhere along the way you stopped doing that and you were only winding one wire 'per side' of the pickup coil?

E-Goose

Hi !

I made it a dual jt , 2 wire per jt .

So i have four leads , you make one with an NPN and one with a PNP then switch the base coils .

Actually i made the first row then removed the nails , twisted the coil a bit then put the nail back in the make the second row , did it twice.
The nail are to big to put enough windings .


However it dose work on the tube  ??? , i can't compare to without it yet .

The next 2 wires will be around the whole thing , but before i need to test a different pickup coil.

The last 2 coil may be used for battery leads ...

Mark

Ps look at page 9

ElectricGoose

Quote from: Mk1 on April 10, 2010, 10:55:03 PM
Hi !

I made it a dual jt , 2 wire per jt .

So i have four A , you make one with an NPN and one with a PNP then switch the base coils .

Actually i made the first row then removed the nails , twisted the coil a bit then put the nail back in the make the second row , did it twice.
The nail are to big to put enough windings .


However it dose work on the tube  ??? , i can't compare to without it yet .

The next 2 wires will be around the whole thing , but before i need to test a different pickup coil.

The last 2 coil may be used for battery leads ...

Mark

Ps look at page 9

Mark

Not 100% sure what you mean about the whole "removing nails to twist coil and 'second row'".  I think I am confused as to what you are terming as 'rows'.  I THINK I know what you mean.  Sounds laborious though if you are doing what I suppose you are.

Thanks for the reply.

E-Goose