Same input-greater output...

[iacob alex]

....as a wish for,and in the same time,as a realm of possibility to imagine a PM device ,can be defined with the help of a setting side by side :

       - the positive work ("H"), done by the fall down of a small unbalance (let's say a first class lever,two equall masses,two unequal arms/a small long arm-short arm difference...).

        -the  negative work ("h") ,done to spring up (remake),the same small unbalance ,as a starting point of a repetitive process .

     Now,if  H>>>h ,or h=constant and  H  is ever increasing ?!

     All the best! / Alex

[FreeEnergy]

huh?

[Alexioco]

Are you saying that by having two equal weights on an off-balance lever, the weight that rises (short side of lever) is ever increasing so it can then repeat its lift from its current position? Is that what you mean? Which wont perpetuate as the long arm will just balance at the bottom...

Alex

[iacob alex]

....it's a simple logic :

     -an off-balance lever (equal masses,unequal arms/"h" is their difference ).

      -starting unbalance: long arm on top position.

      -due to unbalance state and gravity "pressure",the mass on long arm plays positive work(torque),the mass on short arm plays negative work (torque).

      -the motion of the lever (fall) is determined by their torque difference.

       -if we are interested (really...!),to collect more power,we need more space (height "H")...or time (v=g*t).

       -if we have more stored power,we can easy to remake the starting unbalance ( mgh),to "pay" friction and to take out some power supply...

          All the best! / Alex

[FreeEnergy]

uh, i don't get it.