Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Schottky Diode Help

Started by rukiddingme, March 22, 2010, 04:35:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

rukiddingme

I'm gonna piggy back some more questions on this thread.

I have seen many people bundle multiple diodes in parallel. I am under the impression that this does not decrease the forward voltage drop, but does give the bundle the ability carry a higher current. Is this the correct situation with a diode bundle?

Is there any down side to creating bundles of diodes for a full wave bridge.

Is there no benefit of a diode bundle if a single diode is rated for the voltage and current?

Is there any benefit to using diodes very close to the actual voltage and current of the circuit, or is any diode above the volts and current just as good?



kooler

Quote from: rukiddingme on March 22, 2010, 08:16:56 PM

Yep, the RK44 looks like exactly what I want. I'm at 10 -15 volts so I don't need 100 volts. Where did you see the forward drop spec for the RK44?

http://www.datasheetarchive.com/pdf-datasheets/Datasheets-29/DSA-574476.pdf

look at the second chart on the first row.. it shows the forward volts at the needed forward current

robbie

rukiddingme

Quote from: kooler on March 22, 2010, 09:38:16 PM
http://www.datasheetarchive.com/pdf-datasheets/Datasheets-29/DSA-574476.pdf

look at the second chart on the first row.. it shows the forward volts at the needed forward current

robbie


Am I reading the data sheet right to say, maximum volts 30, voltage loss at 1-3 amps is .55?

Do I have to worry about a minimum voltage and what would that be?

blueplanet

You need a germanium schottky, not a silicon schottky.

mscoffman

Quote from: rukiddingme on March 23, 2010, 12:09:10 AM

Am I reading the data sheet right to say, maximum volts 30, voltage loss at 1-3 amps is .55?

Do I have to worry about a minimum voltage and what would that be?

Using kooler's (above) data sheet.

Look at: VFâ€"IF Characteristics (Typical) chart.
(forward voltage vs. forward current)

At the forward voltage of .2Vdc you should be able to draw
(only) 200ma through the diode, even into a short circuit.
The higher the forward voltage the more current can be
drawn. If your load has a characteristic impedance different
from zero  :)  then the amount will be less. The .55 drop
is the worst case for any valid voltage and current and for
any operational diode. This is a real component, so you
have to leave the "perfect" operational models behind
and use the charts.

:S:MarkSCoffman