GENERATOR- YOU DO THE IN/OUT POWER MATH

[DeepCut]

Tried a new setup that is basically the same but uses more wire of a slightly thicker diameter.

Have the wire bunched up so that it is all in the same plane as the magnet.

Results are actually INFERIOR !

I'm not going to work on this one any longer as Tom is much further ahead and i feel like i'm spending time/money for nothing.

I'm thinking we don't even need the magnet so will be experimenting with pulsing coils.


Gary.

[mscoffman]

Mark.

I don't like you anymore !

Just kidding

Damn i knew it was too good to be true ...

So, how do i do the proper calculations ?

Oh, and here is a link to the video, i've just put it up so it may take a minute or two to be there i don't know :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7LbB7FWfO4


Thanks Mark, for teaching

btw i found this, i think it's what you told me so i will learn it :

http://www.tpub.com/neets/book2/4a.htm

those NEETS books are great, nice one US Navy

Gary.

@Deepcut

---

When the current flowing through an inductor continuously reverses itself,
as in the case of an ac source, the inertia effect of the cemf is greater
than with dc. The greater the amount of inductance (L), the greater the
opposition from this inertia effect.

---

Yes, thats it exactly. You know, there is conservation of energy
in the bridge rectifier. So that the AC energy-in is equal to the
DC energy-out, with the appropriate load resistor that maximizes
the DC power calculation (pulses filtered etc.) So by calculating
the DC energy-out correctly, you know the net energy, Then you
use the peak to peak AC voltage to calculate the effective AC coil
resistance...You can either use it in the future or chunk it into the
inductive reactance equation (backwards) to get the inductance
L of the coil. So by going around in a math calculation loop several times
you limit the potetial for errors and mistakes. You get good information
for the future, if you don't change things, and you can do accurate
estimates of how much and what direction to change things if you
want something different.

Hopefully, you will still try to put in place a circuit to see if your motor
can self run. Since your output voltage seems about twice the input.

I swear, that if you do the calculations and measurements correctly
you'll get the correct result.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[DeepCut]

Ye i bought a DPDT switch and a voltage regulator along with the correct resistors so will try to self-run it.

Still not overly-confident with new components, is this the sort of circuit i want to regulate voltage for self-running :

http://www.tkk.fi/Misc/Electronics/circuits/psu_5v.html

Thanks,

Gary.

[DeepCut]

Tom's latest video, he's so clever he has the magnet/axle friction-free !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1v1ykiVuQU&feature=channel


Gary.

[FatChance!!!]

If it takes no friction when trying to make a device self run, then it's certainly not overunity.
The only real overunity device is one that is able to self run while sustaining an external load, friction included.

Tom's latest video, he's so clever he has the magnet/axle friction-free !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1v1ykiVuQU&feature=channel


Gary.