Bismuth core Joule thief

[elgersmad]

Bill

The education system was not randomly changed.....it is a few very specific things.........well thought out and time tested..
I am sure that there are things built into the business world that are designed to prevent OU devices from going public.
I remember a story of John Bedini getting a visit from some thugs in business suits .......perhaps visits like this are more common than we think .

The energy industry also probably buys up any ideas that they see as threatening their profit....remember the Meyer water car showing up for sale a while back? If it had been bought by someone to develop the technology we should have heard of something by now.

gary

That is ironic.  Before there were any laws against hacking 1990s.  I was a hacker.  I got together with a group of individuals online and the code broke into a Military Training Base's computer network.  Think about the Pentagon, any idiot would look there.  That's so obvious that they'll catch most beginners.  But, if you think about the military most people serve for a few years or until retirement, and whoever's moving up in rank, still has to receive orders and know the details of the mission summary for the position they're training for.  So, most of those secrets should be where somebody else would train for the position.

The Patent Office, and everything you do to keep a secret to retain rights to your royalties, works for them.  If anything goes in there that would retain their interest, they can ditch you.  They have a few Enemy of the State kind of modes.  If you were ever a victim, you'd know.  They'd get your college credits, if you attended, they'd get your degree.  If you work too hard, they might send a mental health professional, who's just a ruse.  Out of all of the people that they've jacked, only one has ever surfaced and he invented the shoulder launched guided missile.  He's the only guy, that had enough money to attempt to fight back, and the only guy, who ever received any publicity trying to.  These days, when you watch the History Channel, and Discovery, they really position themselves where they admit to having killed him.  But, think about this for a minute.  You or I, obey the law, and then the government won't pay your for your work.  They want to mass produce your invention, and get rid of any point of paying royalties too you.  Any other inventor of a toy, tool, or whatever has that right, their patent rights.  Now, if you lived in a country that didn't obey or uphold it's own laws, and took or stole your money by refusing to pay you, do you think that you would stick around for very long?  So, he went to work for somebody else to build a gun, a really big gun.  But, he'd always worked on those kinds of devices.  He worked designing a space gun to launch small satellites into space.  They don't really display the whole truth, nor how America, was his motive to leave the country.  The gun he was working on, wouldn't reach America.  In some sense, I feel and believe that he was more certain that he'd be paid by this foreign country, where he just got ripped off and lost in a lengthy court battle in America.  With them pretending that they don't blacklist anyone, I'm fairly sure he didn't and couldn't get work in America.  Well, you know who's biting at his heals.  Now, they don't deny having killed him but, they don't admit to cheating him, nor driving him off.  Well, hell yea.  I read the mission statements, but there's the proof.  It just wasn't an over unity device.

A working Over Unity device would make you a Threat to National Security, if and only if, it out performs nuclear power.  Anything like that threatens the nuclear stockpile because, as soon as the voting public sees it, they'll believe it, and protest, or petition the government to shut down the nuclear reactors.  At that point, they don't have any means of producing enriched uranium to build bombs with.  Anything in storage, would have to be refined a second time because of the half life of radioactive elements.  At the point the reactors shut down, that's where the cold war philosophy hasn't died.  The dates on this junk is weird too.  It really shows that the peak of the ice-burg starts where the US scientists who invented the first nuke, handed off the how tos over to Russia.  So, the whole initiative starts there and then with that and other possible situations that could or would be a threat to the production and maintenance of nuclear warheads.  Nuclear power was just a cover for bomb production that really worked out.

They can influence your employers by posing as investigators, and manipulate your work schedule.  They can threaten your relatives in ways you wouldn't think could turn them against you.  Really weird shit.  They are the men in black too.  Basically, it's PSYOP that handles it.  They'll come from one base Army to visit a Navy base where a UFO was spotted.  They are always looking for those to keep you from finding out about how those super efficient star drives work.  If one of those crash, they don't want anyone to know, and yea' they all of the pieces.  Anybody figures out how to put that thing back together, fix or repair it, and it really would have to have some incredible power system.  It's the same logic that drives that.  They want to know how it works.  They may not use it but, they really do want every bit of how to build their own.  Most of the people only know what they are suppose to be doing and are not train or taught what somebody else is.  Special forces receives one kind of training, repair techs several specific types, and the guy that's suppose to keep his mouth shut, was trained too.  Just like the hypercritical critics, some number of them are military.  Retroactive, means that even though they are retired, they could have an underlying mission.  Like getting pissed off, and acting like I don't know what I'm talking about.  Pissing about my english and how it was spelled out.  Working to prove I'm stupid, when he or she cannot find an experiment of that sort to prove anything has or has not be looked into.  But, you can't know until you look right?  If nobody's tried it, then why not if it is a good hypothesis?  The greatest of all inventors has plenty of failed inventions.  There's a book published on the subject, "Failed Inventions of Great Inventors"  They wouldn't be great if trial and error were not a part of the process.  Looking around to see what others have done, to try that which no one else has yet to have tried.

[resonanceman]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090522154504.htm

This article really says something too me.  That bismuth iron composites would make super awesome magnetic amplifier and saturable core materials.  If the objective were to suddenly turn on or off an AC power source, the bismuth is squaring the saturation curve via an eddy current.

Well, if you wanted to make 97% iron and 3% bismuth, you'd need to electroplate a slug 30% bismuth and 70% iron before the priming alloy slug could work in a batch.  The melting point would have to be lowered and mixing enabled.  It may not be possible or practical except by a rotating electroplating method.  If the bismuth is going to vaporize or cannot be contained at between 30% maybe adding it to nickel instead could by that alloy time but, it may just foam right out the crucible.

If you spin the positive anode, and have two negative electrodes, one nickel iron and the other bismuth.  The ratio of current flow if 70% is through the nickel iron and 30% is through the bismuth, the anode will be coated with the alloy.  It's just a matter of keeping the anode spinning.  If anything, you need to be certain that your ionic solution doesn't produce an oxide on the anode of any of the three metals that are going into it.  So, it would be good for electroplating nickel, iron, and bismuth.

elgersmad

Thanks for the links
I don't have alot of time right now but I will check them out soon

I see you have been doing serious thinking about how the system really works.  All the laws are on the side of the people with the big money......no matter how corrupt  they are.



I like your electroplating idea.


gary

[elgersmad]

elgersmad

Thanks for the links
I don't have alot of time right now but I will check them out soon

I see you have been doing serious thinking about how the system really works.  All the laws are on the side of the people with the big money......no matter how corrupt  they are.



I like your electroplating idea.


gary

I re-read what I wrote, and my thoughts are sometimes broken up by the time that they are typed.  I apologize for that.  I'm glad that you could follow it.  At one time, I made an alloy in the 80s before having elemental mercury was any issue and it was in all kinds of switches, and the stuff was so slippery, you couldn't really hang on too it.  It made oil and soap seem like nothing.  It was mercury copper.  I won't give away the magical chemical that I used to make this alloy because, mercury is some really nasty stuff.  I don't even know if I can have kids.  I do know that it's never happened.  But, this much is for certain.  There is a reference book, and you might be able to gain access too it at a library.  It's an electroplating reference and it covers all kinds of metals from zinc to you name it.  Believe me, chrome is not everything in electroplating.

Modern Electroplating

It's a reference, and all you are looking for is an acid, chloride, or alkaloid solution that won't turn any one of the metals in your alloy into an oxide.  It will produce hydrogen and oxygen, and almost no matter what you do.  So, it is important to keep the anode spinning when you are making custom alloys.  Usually, it includes a mole conversion to how many electrons are required for a given reaction, to get one metal to bond to another.  For 50/50  If the chemical equation is 3 moles, that's just three amperes.  If the other metal requires only 2 moles , then that would only require 2 amperes.  So, one cathode/negative connection is at 2 amperes, and the other is at 3 amperes, and the anode would take up 5 amperes.  So, you need the chemical equation.  Electrolysis is probably the easiest reference to understand the equation.  Because, the 2 moles is written mole^-2 which looks weird because, it's written like a power of ten.  There's a reason and it's due to the mole being a reference to Faraday's Charge Constant which is different than joule, watt, ampere or volt.  Technically, it's an ampere, and you can multiply to get that 50/50 ratio.  So, 10 times the amperage does the job ten times faster 20 amperes and 30 amperes.

I really liked your response.

But, don't eliminate the potential of oxides doing something.  Zinc Oxide is piezoelectric.  Copper Oxide isn't very conductive, and when you find a metal that doesn't conduct or develops a very high resistance or is semiconductive, there is no way to predict what would happen.  You could drop it, and wind up getting shocked.  Here's the funny part, you could probably make it with table salt, water and two metals, one being zinc.  Titanium oxide is resistive and so is cobalt oxide.  Silver oxide is highly conductive, so it's out.  Amazing what you might be able to do with with an old watch band and a penny with a tablespoon of salt in quart jar, isn't it?


Voltage won't make sense.  Sometimes you'll be trying to charge a battery that just wants to run down and you'll be fighting what they call autoplating.  Amperes are all that matter and the mole equations.

[resonanceman]

although bismuth ferrite is an insulating material, running through its crystals are ultrathin (two-dimensional) sheets called "domain walls" that conduct electricity at room temperature.

This reminds  me of electrinium  .....The theory is  if you an make the right alloy with positive and negative charges on the ends of the molecule..... then keep those molecules in orderly lines as  you cool the alloy the end result will be like  a magnet only creating an electric charge rather than a magnetic charge.

My best guess is to melt it  then cool it under a strong magnetic field and running high voltage through it.....the voltage would probably  have to taper off to allow it to cool.

According to the theory of electrinium the right element for the alloy would be something that could be used to make a bismuth battery.

Of course.........any one with even half an education knows that such a thing is not possible




gary


http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5479.0;wap2

[elgersmad]

although bismuth ferrite is an insulating material, running through its crystals are ultrathin (two-dimensional) sheets called "domain walls" that conduct electricity at room temperature.

This reminds  me of electrinium  .....The theory is  if you an make the right alloy with positive and negative charges on the ends of the molecule..... then keep those molecules in orderly lines as  you cool the alloy the end result will be like  a magnet only creating an electric charge rather than a magnetic charge.

My best guess is to melt it  then cool it under a strong magnetic field and running high voltage through it.....the voltage would probably  have to taper off to allow it to cool.

According to the theory of electrinium the right element for the alloy would be something that could be used to make a bismuth battery.

Of course.........any one with even half an education knows that such a thing is not possible




gary


http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5479.0;wap2

Sometimes, something may sound half cocked or crazy, and not be wrong, just impossible or improbable.  PN junctions make great diode, and if the area is large enough and it's photosensitive, it makes a great solar cell.  There are all metal PN junctions, for example, thermocouples.  Hi-Z Technology, sell thermoelectric cells that convert heat into electricity.  Water is a strong dipole, but it's useless except for use in low voltage capacitors.  It retains a very high charge and has a very high dielectric constant.  As a result, water is very good at storing electrons.  But, it has a very low breakdown voltage and that makes it not so good.  If you have a van degraff a piece of wire and a bottle of deionized distilled water, it can do some crazy stuff in the dark.  If you remove the wire from the water before the van degraff is turned off, picking up the bottle of water can be stupid and you can get one hell of shock.  Not only that, it can shock you more than once.

If you could produce millions of layers or more of PN junctions, I've always been curious due to breakdown voltages, what happens if you have enough junctions to start electrons just following the electric field lines.  That like saying PN too many times in the same substrate should breakdown.  5 million volts DC is the breakdown voltage of space itself.  Electrons can jump almost any distance after you reach that voltage.  There's a point where two infinite planes in space cannot retain a charge, and no matter what an electron will jump the gap.  Literally, that's an unknown.  But, for a small distance, or with two spheres 300,000 volts to meter squared and you'll see a corona discharge.  Sharp points reach that point quicker than rounded or blunt object and spheres fair the best.  So, when you buy van degraff and it's rated to produce up to 75KV, the sphere is literally only little over 8 inches in diameter, and the sphere regulates the voltage.  Increase the current flow, and it will just glow brighter and never get past that voltage.  It's the curve of the sphere that decides the voltage.  When it's all DC that is the way it is.  AC is a different creature.

So, you could look at electronegativity for the atom, which is a ratio of neutrons protons and electrons against mass.  If you find a strong positive, you could literally rotate it slowly enough, and use a low current to in effect use some math to count how many atoms deep a layer would be.  Then use a clock motor that turns at 1 RPM.  Most of the electronics equations are written in terms of volts, amperes and watts.  The number of electrons moving tells you how many atoms when from the electrode to the anode.  So, you can literally calculate when you should get to that voltage.  But, you might need Copper foil, ferric chloride PC board etchant to get the first two layers separated.  Then set your Voltmeter to diode check and measure the barrier voltage.  Any model paint that will stick, even a piece of tape will prevent the etchant from eating the metal under the tape.  Paint or a resist marker is better because the solvents that completely remove them come with them or are easy to get and don't require allot of friction to remove.  Measure the voltage of the barrier.  Lower the current and see what the minimum number of atoms required literally add to be.  Then set your power supply dials to make an all metal battery.  You'll need to etch through all of the layers in order to keep them from touching.  Cutting will cut across them and push layers together and short them out.  Etching won't.  Etch the cylinder in half  So, paint the whole thing except a thin line that will cut in half.  Then sink it in ferric chloride and it will cut it in half.  It may take an hour or two but it will cut through it.  You can cut through a penny that way.  Right when the thing approaches being two pieces, it might start an avalanche of electrons.  That would take 4,999,993 layers at 0.7 volts within a few inches of thickness.  You would always place your negative with the positive metal and the negative metal on opposite sides of the rotating drum and very close to the rotating drum.  It would take 9.5 years for that many layers at that RPM.  Before it will happen in an autonomous fashion, you will need to defeat the breakdown voltage of space.  That is around 5 million volts.  3 million is the lowest that those kinds of effects have been seen.  Printing them on a chip is much different than layers.  You couldn't really hope for much without stimulation from a chip like that even if were printed on a tube.

In a vacuum chamber you could in theory move things faster if you have the cylinder quadranted.  You have two vacuum pumps sucking any impurities away, and two sources of ions.  Still, it would require some measurable current but vacuum deposition could do it faster.  Then the RPM could be in the hundreds or thousands.  Your anode would have to handle allot of current though.  Since, it is spiralled on, I don't believe that you'll have to defeat the entire barrier voltage that you'll have once cut in half.  But, you will have to defeat some measurable barrier voltage and be prepared to produce a power supply to defeat that and produce some current.

Here's the irony of all of that.  When you see the distance an arc jumps, that's the space you're trying to produce a voltage that's equal or greater than.  20 volts per millimeter.  So, the more layers, the better.  The larger the area, the higher the current.  The better the two conducting metals, the better the results.  More often than not, all you get is a potential and no avalanche.  So, it's more than 20 volts to the millimeter that you'd be really looking for.  Several hundred layers should be enough to make determination.  But, if you're bent on it, a thousand or more.  You just need to be certain that you have a real layer of one metal, then the next.  If you go by eye that color related.  There's a thin an complete layer of aluminum or gold on every liquid crystal television, and you're looking through the gold or aluminum.  So, a layer can be so thin, you can see right through it.