Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Chalkalis Gravity Wheel

Started by teslaalset, July 10, 2010, 08:52:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


tbird

i think i saw someone make the comment....use electrical pulse to kick the arm... or something like that.

couldn't harry paul sprain's motor be modified to fill the bill?

(http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Paul_Harry_Sprain_magnet_motor)

if instead of the rotor being in a horizontal plane, put it in a vertical plane (the whole motor) and remove one of the rotor magnets (to give the pendulum effect).  this would require half of the power since there would only be one pulse per rpm instead of two.

i'm not sure where the coil should be located, but i would think at about the 10-11 o'clock position (ccw rotation).

to make it a self runner, a gen could be driven by the output shaft that charged a cap.  would 95% of one rpm be enough to charge the cap enough to pulse the coil?  would there be power left over?

anyone see anything to keep it from working/being ou (maybe the answers to the questions above)?

tom
It's better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and prove it!


Ted Ewert

This thing is no more than a rotating pendulum. If it were really gaining energy it would continue to accelerate when the power is removed. It does not. I wrote the following on Energetic Forum following a lengthly discussion on this device's merits:

QuoteOpen letter to Mr Chalkalis...
Our discussion here has revealed a few serious problems which call into question your claims.
1. The most glaring is the most obvious: If your device actually gained energy, why is it not self rotating? Where does all that extra energy go when the power is removed? There can't be that much bearing friction and wind resistance to overcome.
2. You suggest that the power be taken off the main shaft. Why haven't you simply attached a cheap alternator to the shaft and measured it's output? You have a pulley right on the shaft! Use a 24 volt model and you could run your drive motor and measure how much extra you have left over.
3. Your math proves nothing. Do you know the difference between torque and horsepower? You calculate torque based on a no load situation, then compare it to input power. Apples and oranges my friend.
If you can't manage a generator, it's very simple to construct a Prony break which will give you a fairly accurate measurement of your actual power out.

After working on this concept for 28 years, it's hard to believe you built that whole device and didn't take some simple output power measurements. I see a pulley right on your main shaft for Pete's sake! Why are you withholding this information?
You immediately start whining about people pointing out legitimate errors in your statements, and asking perfectly reasonable questions (red flag). Yet, without answering anything you still want us to go to all the expense and trouble of building a replica just based on your opinion? I don't think so.
None of this adds up Chalkalis, and you know it. We are more than willing to extend the benefit of the doubt, and I think we have here, but we don't appreciate being played for fools.
What is your real reason for doing all of this?

Ted Ewert

I am not implying that a rotating pendulum is incapable of producing extra energy. Milkovic has shown how his oscillator generates energy from a pendulum. The problem is that the Chalkalis device will not produce any extra energy on the main shaft as it has been presented.
You'll see this for yourself if you build a replica. Then you can figure out a real way of extracting energy from this device.

Cheers,

Ted

Cloxxki

Milkovic has shown nothing, other than a nice way to get high torque out for short pulses, from longer low-torque, equal work input. Not one replication, even a recent genious one that had full syncronization from output to input, ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJsXLiLNJHA ) was unable to keep going, let alone offer the 12x claimed output.

If you've ever seen a better attempt, let alone by Milkovic himself, please let me know, I'd be most interested to see, study, and replicate it.