Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

Started by Rosemary Ainslie, July 18, 2010, 10:42:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: nul-points on July 29, 2010, 07:13:05 PM
  Rosemary, you *have* to see this:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOv0AkphLhE&feature=pyv&ad=4232609694&kw=magnet&gclid=CNefjon5kaMCFYeY2Aodini3nA

...zipons, or what?!?  :)
Hello Sandy,
I've seen this before.  How fascinating is that?  Just to rabbit on a little about physics - you probably know this.  Bell's theorems.  Let me assure you I have no idea what they are - but I do understand their conclusion.  From memory he says something to the effect 'The statistical predictions of quantum theories ....cannot be upheld by local hidden variables'.  I think this points to the fact that on a very profound level there has to be PERFECT symmetry - else our manifest universe would need to be utterly chaotic.  And it does seem as if that magnetised spherical shape very easily forms into symmetrical arrangements.  I am SO into patterns.  I'll have to try and get hold of some of those magnets.  Where does one buy them?

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

otto

Hello all,

@Rosemary

so you want to warm up 8 liters of water.

You know about cold fusion??

Otto

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: otto on July 30, 2010, 02:13:42 AM
Hello all,

@Rosemary

so you want to warm up 8 liters of water.

You know about cold fusion??

Otto
hello all.

@Otto.
Interesting question.  Do you?
Rosemary

otto

Finally a clever person named Rosemary.

About heating water and the cold fusion stuff I know almost everything. I worked for years on the cold fusion "problem". I also heated my house with the  cold fusion principle. The problem was that is was summer and outside hot and not to mention inside my house. HOT!!

I used cold fusion only to heat up water in a very fast way. It was really not a problem but in that time I didnt know about pulsed coils and all the stuff.

In short why dont you heat up 0,2 liters of water and this water is feeded into a heat exchanger ......bla,bla, bla.... old boring stuff.

Otto

fritz

I would upscale & verify the original setup in a very careful way:

1.) Optimize the wiring to shortest possible connections with perfect contacts avoiding loops using   upscaled     diameters.
     (we don´t want to be fooled by EMF or contact issues)
2.) Analyse the effect with an entire lot of batteries observing chemistry
3.) Identify the feedback mechanism which is causes that jittering oscillation.
     This could be EMF, power spikes - but probably its the load spike coupled via drain-gate capacity via R1      pot - NE555 output - NE555 internal protection diodes - finally shifting NE555 comparator levels causing jittering oscillation.
4.) Try to galvanically isolate pulse generator from power circuit using opto-coupler.
     Maybe its possible to get the effect on feeding _ANY_ jittering oscillation with similar frequency.
5.) Identify the role of R1 as consequence of the 3.) - 4.)
     Is the role of R1 just to maintain that jittering oscillation using parasitic feedback from backEMF coupled via DS-cap ?. Is the role of R1 to limit the slope of charging the gate - or both. Would it work with outside jittering control signal - or is the feedback from the physical  load needed ?

6.) Based on 5.) it should be possible to design a robust system with properly driven mosfet (eliminate R1), operating independent from mosfet type and "instant on" operation. (maybe adaptive controller needed)

7.) Now it would be the right time to upscale batteries, currents, mosfets.
     Is this effect upscalable ? is there a maximum current depending on battery type ?

... and so on.
find the apropriate questions - and get your answers.

just replacing that mosfet with igbt, scr, ss-relay would change the way how this operates by 5 dimensions, with the only outcome that it doesnt work. Even if you could achieve same operation- you would restart at 3) seeing 5 other effects to explain.