Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Rosemary,

A picture is indeed worth a thousand words...  those renders are very telling.  I have put together similar 3d models as a result, and time permitting, will attempt to make visuals representing what I am talking about with multitudes of tiny particles as opposed to spheres.  To be clear, that is a lithium nucleus you have modeled?  I am reviewing your other documents... my time is short at the moment with customers and my little ones, so pardon my delay in responding.  Also, I am not sure what 3d modeling package you are using, but I have experience with the concepts involved in modeling from similar work some time ago.  NURBS curves and surfaces might be quite handy for you in this process... they allow control over movement/placement of single or multiple vertices
as opposed to the entire piece of geometry.


Hi Bill,
Nice to meet you.  Great work on the EB and Joule Thief... good to see another Jolly Roger on the horizon;)

Cheers,
Twinbeard

Hi Twinbeard - thanks for this.  I need to disabuse you of any idea that it's my software that I'm working with here.  It's the skilled work of a friend of mine who's trying to help me with the model.  We've actually designed a proton which has the required Gluon/Pion/quark mix that our classicists have identified and in the right ratios.  So it conforms.  But it was never an 'imposed' design.  It's a natural progression of the structure from composites of that elusive dipole.   

He's finally structued the electron - but I need to upload it and I want to try and upload it - in motion - if possible.  It's blow away stuff.  Very careful symmetries and - since the proposal is that the proton = 3 electrons then we've hopefully resolved the proton's interactions as well.

In any event - I'll try and upload this later or impose on a friend to do it for me.

Guys - apologies for not being able to upload more on the switches for the application test.  We're still working against holidays on campus and those of us that are still plodding - we're in need of some guidance that is not quite there yet.  One needs huge helpings of patience and it's not something that the Good Lord gave me in any significant quantities. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

ADDED  And Bill - my manners are appalling.  I missed all these posts because I was down last night.  Thank you - as ever.  I'm truly indebted.  If you're not a full on moderator it's my opinion that you should be.  Your contributions are GOLD.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

[twinbeard]

Hi Twinbeard - thanks for this.  I need to disabuse you of any idea that it's my software that I'm working with here.  It's the skilled work of a friend of mine who's trying to help me with the model.  We've actually designed a proton which has the required Gluon/Pion/quark mix that our classicists have identified and in the right ratios.  So it conforms.  But it was never an 'imposed' design.  It's a natural progression of the structure from composites of that elusive dipole.   

He's finally structued the electron - but I need to upload it and I want to try and upload it - in motion - if possible.  It's blow away stuff.  Very careful symmetries and - since the proposal is that the proton = 3 electrons then we've hopefully resolved the proton's interactions as well.

Well, whomever is responsible, it is telling.  I like the field overlapping showing the distribution of charge.  It was this that I was referring to concerning the NURBS.  One could match those field representations to the actual shapes of those interacting fields... much like a Flux Transfer Event between the Sun and Earth: 

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/30oct_ftes/
http://techtransfer.gsfc.nasa.gov/newsletter/images/SDO09-fluxrope-590px.jpg
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/203795main_FluxPower_400.jpg

once every 8 minutes... approximately 2.083 x 10^-3 hertz.
at we get hit with a DC pulse of 650kA @ 30kV.


I concur that animating any interaction would be most advantageous.

I spent a few hours playing with a fractal explorer last night, and found some patterns that may interest you, appearing similar to your renderings in some instances, and complex interactions of magnetic fields in others: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqPlzsXvScs

I have yet to texture the models I made appropriately to show my concept of "another fractal iteration" in sub atomic particles... hopefully I can get to that soon.  I look forward to your electron animations/renders!

Cheers,
Twinbeard

In any event - I'll try and upload this later or impose on a friend to do it for me.

Guys - apologies for not being able to upload more on the switches for the application test.  We're still working against holidays on campus and those of us that are still plodding - we're in need of some guidance that is not quite there yet.  One needs huge helpings of patience and it's not something that the Good Lord gave me in any significant quantities. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

ADDED  And Bill - my manners are appalling.  I missed all these posts because I was down last night.  Thank you - as ever.  I'm truly indebted.  If you're not a full on moderator it's my opinion that you should be.  Your contributions are GOLD.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

[Pirate88179]

Twinbeard:

Avast!  Nice to me you too and thank you.

Rose:

Thank you too.

Bill

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi guys,

I need to acknowledge something which I reported on wrongly.  It appears my 'locked threads' at EF.com do, indeed, have the equivalent exposure to the Mosfet Heating circuits.  It's nice to know.  What's not so 'happy' is that I cannot comment on the spurious nonsense related to that interminable debate regarding the battery draw downs, nor the claims by Aaron that he put in 'thousands of hours' of testing.  Rather overstated and I think intended to justify his appropriation of my Fluke that should have been more generally available.

But I am grateful that those threads haven't also been buried.

Regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2a3uTU0fgc&feature=related

I can't find the appropriate thread and I don't want to lose this again.  So for now I'm just holding this video here

Rosemary