Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys,  I just need to interrupt the 'topic' marginally to explain something that MUST remain OPEN SOURCE.

Here it is.  We're restricted in 'scaling up' on this system because of restrictions to the transistor.  The MOSFET system is ideal because it has an internal body diode that can channel a path for the current flow during the 'off period' of the duty cycle.  But MOSFETs are NOT built to take the kind of wattage that's required for a realistic application.  We're hoping to get around this by varying the component parts of the resistor to reduce the Ohm's value - yet somehow keep the actual current flow to a level it can withstand.  Tricky.

HOWEVER.  I've been thinking of varying the arrangement while still using the 'concepts' that are forged through our thesis.  If indeed current flow comprises, let us for these purposes call it 'charge' rather than the 'flow of electrons' then theoretically we should be able to use a lead acid battery 'in the loop' with an alkaline battery.  The discharge of the one would recharge the other and vice versa.  For those chemists reading here - remember that the anode of the alkaline is the negative terminal. 

This 'principle' has been variously endorsed by sundry chemists whom I've spoken to but still requires a detailed analysis of the chemistry involved.  And the actual problem is to find an alkaline with the same capacity as a lead acid. 

This may assist us in increasing the actual wattage delivered without necessarily routing it through the MOSFET.  But we're working on the required circuits.  And I'm only posting this to ensure that this development is IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN - lest anyone try and patent it!!!

In any event.  We need to explore this option more thoroughly and will incorporate these tests as well.  For anyone - any chemists - who see the significance - feel free to test this.  But know that I have not done so myself and cannot therefore assure you that you won't be wasting your time.  It is however, theoretically seductive - as it points to a possible 'closed system'.  We need this.  We really do need this.  LOL.  But the details of that required circuit - I'll have to work on it.  I did post this on EF.com - but it was really too sketchy.  It'll be my weekend homework.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising

[otto]

Hello all,

@Rosemary

show us, if possible, the waves you get from your system. Dont say you have only square waves!!

Otto

[ramset]

Rosemary
Just for the record,
Otto is a very good guy that shares much at this forum!
Any info you can give him will benefit all!

Chet

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello all,

@Rosemary

show us, if possible, the waves you get from your system. Dont say you have only square waves!!

Otto

@Otto
Check out the waveforms on the paper. 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary
Just for the record,
Otto is a very good guy that shares much at this forum!
Any info you can give him will benefit all!

Chet

It's perhaps an unfortunate that you ever make a recommendation Chet - with respect.  I remember how you advanced TK's contributions which a parade of exaggerated praise that proceded or preceded his every post.  TK is NOT intending to promote this or any OU technology.  Had I and others not resisted those interventions I'm satisfied this technology would be thoroughly buried by now.  In fact - if my memory serves - Wilby managed a rather skilfull dialectic that finally silenced him. 

My hope is that unlike TK - Otto is earnestly attempting to advance Over Unity type technologies.