Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

Where can I find a parts list and schematic?  I will build one, and report results.

Cheers,
Scott

Scott?  I wondered if we'd get closer to an identity here.  Nice to put a name to an avatar - so to speak.  Hi again.

If you download the attached link - it's got everything that opens and shuts on the circuit.  Delighted to hear you're up for this Twinbeard.  Very nice indeed - the more so as I'm really blown away by your general experimental talents.  Feel free to open a thread.  I think there are many who may want to follow it.  I know in the early stages there were a few takers.  But I saw it dominating my own interests here and rather discouraged it.  But I suspect you'll get a good following.

Kindest regards
Rosie
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

I think you may need to sign up to Scribd to get their download facilities.  Not sure.

GREAT STUFF SCOTT.   

[TinselKoala]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS


Well, I see that that preprint bears the page heading of the IEEE Journal of Transactions of Industrial Electronics.

Congratulations on getting your paper published, Rosemary.
The last I heard it had been summarily rejected by the journal. Twice.

[WilbyInebriated]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS


Well, I see that that preprint bears the page heading of the IEEE Journal of Transactions of Industrial Electronics.

Congratulations on getting your paper published, Rosemary.
The last I heard it had been summarily rejected by the journal. Twice.

tk, i'm glad you're back here. you left some contradictions of yours that i would like to talk to you about. you ran off crying when your hack was shown to be a hack and when your transistor 'prediction' kinda turned out the opposite as you predicted. hopefully you can be a little more grownup about it this time...

[TinselKoala]

tk, i'm glad you're back here. you left some contradictions of yours that i would like to talk to you about. you ran off crying when your hack was shown to be a hack and when your transistor 'prediction' kinda turned out the opposite as you predicted. hopefully you can be a little more grownup about it this time...

And meanwhile everything I "hacked" has been confirmed over and over by the various "teams" like Glen, Ashtweth, Aaron, Harvey, and others. And I note major .... er..... differences.... or maybe not .... in the design shown above from what I did. What transistor is being used in the circuit above?

May I remind you that I boiled water with the Ainslie circuit something like two years ago....

But why spoil things by criticising me... surely you share Rosemary's joy at being published in a major peer-reviewed professional journal.

[WilbyInebriated]

And meanwhile everything I "hacked" has been confirmed over and over by the various "teams" like Glen, Ashtweth, Aaron, Harvey, and others. And I note major .... er..... differences.... or maybe not .... in the design shown above from what I did. What transistor is being used in the circuit above?

May I remind you that I boiled water with the Ainslie circuit something like two years ago....

But why spoil things by criticising me... surely you share Rosemary's joy at being published in a major peer-reviewed professional journal.

at least you finally admit yours was a hack instead of clinging to that 'replication' claim...

may i remind you that you only started on this back in june of 2009...

of course i do, don't you? thank goodness i don't have to share your shame... you claiming changing transistors would make no difference. lol, that one still makes me giggle. and i see you are still avoiding those contradictions of yours. business as usual, tk style. it's good to know some things never change.