The downfalls of conventional electrolysis - and how to fix them

[ramset]

Oswald
I've asked an amazing Opensource engineer
User Magluvin [Mags] to take a look at this thread.
He's as busy as a one legged man in an ass kickin contest
But said he'd take a look see.
Be ready with your questions on coils, resonance, tank circuits and such!
He's gonna want to see a circuit to get an idea
I can repost the one I ran By Mr. Hunter
[The one from Jesus]
@iquant
I went to walmart and a few other big stores, no inductive
cook tops,
But now I see your lookin at Lamps I'll wait abit for the dust to settle
Feels like Day 1
But a good day!
Chet

[StihlWoody]

Chet,

Don't let Farrah get you down.  We are all on the right track by trying.

Edison tried EVERY combination available at the time to get the INCANDESCENT bulb to work on DC power.  Why was this so important?

Because Tesla had FLUORESCENT and NEON bulbs in operation for quite some time, but the GRID was DC, and it was imperative that AC didn't put Edison out of business and out of a job. 

Clearly AC and Fluorescent/ Neon lights still won out in the end...though it took a while.

So compare this to Farrah's attitude, with her being Edison...

The fact that I was reading all 131 posts, and it's of my opine that she's on a perpetual menstrual cycle, menopause or hasn't had enough to drink each day, or too much to drink/smoke each day.  If she had tried anything at all, she would have pictures, proof of something, even a failed attempt.

Talking about a failed try and proving that you actually TRIED are 2 totally different things, and as she decried you, Alaska, and Oswald to be liars...

I seem to recall "A person who speaks the loudest against something is hiding their own fears..."

Had a girlfriend accuse me of being a Player.  Later...after we broke up, found out she was the player, as I was left confused.  Again she cried that I was the culprit, when clearly she was hiding her own fears behind a loud lying accusation.

I see some parallels here, and though it may not mean much of anything to psycho-analyze Farrah...

I do strongly suggest that you quit wasting your time on her.  Obvious she's not going to put out in any way thinkable, so just forget her and move on.

You are a bright individual, and though I can see that you hold the fence, not deciding that it's bunk science until absolutely proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, you have an open mind and are provoking people to move forward. 

Cheer-leaders keep the spirit up on the team to do their best despite the failures.  What other purpose could they really serve?

StihlWoody

[ramset]

SW
Thanks Bud,
Its not possible to evaluate this from the perspective of just one science or field of expertise.

An electrical engineer
a chemical engineer
and a physicist

All would argue about what is taking place here,
You see I absolutely believe this is possible,no fence for me,Fellows are doing this without salts and Stifler is doing it in sterile Lab water[not even a conductor].

I believe in the next few days we will be getting started down this road.

And I am quite excited about it,no matter what happens!

As far as Farrah, I sincerely feel bad ,I despise conflict
But In this case I despise her dishonesty more.
Although I still consider her a huge asset to this community!

Where the heck is the "Fox" ?? [niu fox]
Chet

[iquant]

Induction Ballasts are also used by High Pressure Sodium Lamps.  I'm guessing at the resonance frequency of Sodium amalgam.  These lamps have been around since the 1960's... Some nice technical info: HPS Servicing Guide   

 

[StihlWoody]

Fox is about 18 miles north of Fairbanks.  Drove through it...blinked and missed it. 

How does one post pictures here?

Farrah, if she would post PROOF of an attempt, even a failed one, would do herself a lot of credibility to the community.

Even a failed attempt is nonetheless an attempt.

From her arguing, I found her email, and I asked her if it ever occurred to her to DIRECTLY contact AlaskaStar and ASK for the missing pieces, if there are any?

I haven't heard a reply yet, so...

Now, if a replication is successful, as per Farrah's argument, WHOM gets the credit?  The guy who came up with the idea?  Or the one who made it work?

Clearly by the dates of publication on the PowerPoint, and the dates of PATENT... AS clearly had the lead over Kanzius and Norman. So does Kanzius get it?  Norman?  AS?  Someone here? 

And is the credit something to fight over?

Maybe the fight should be for the future of all people, eh?

StihlWoody