Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ronald Classen's H2O Motor Project

Started by rlm555339, April 07, 2005, 12:30:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Kysmett

As far as surface area to atom-count goes, the mass difference might also have something to do with it.  You can place many more smaller atoms on a surface than larger ones.  Although I have looked into electrolysis quite a bit, the drive seems to be to have as much surface area as possible, period.  On both the cathode and the anode.  I have never seen a discussion on cathode to anode ratio.

rlm555339

Question for anyone:
If you visit the Rexresearch site and the Garrett Caruretor of 1935, you'll see that he changes polarity peridically.
http://www.rexresearch.com/hyfuel/garrett/garrett.htm
Is this necessary?  Why?

Dave,
Without doing the tests, my gut says that the same size cathode and anode will produce the disassociation effectively.  I'm not an expert on electrolysis but as an electrician, you are only going to get equivilant conductivity on either electrode.  So twice the material surface would amount to half the current as the other one......hence half the production.  Make sense?  To me, it all evens out so you might as well go with the same sizes since I don't think you are going to get one electrode to carry twice the load as your other element through water.

Ronald Classen, 30+ years electrical tech

KSW

id guess that changing the polarity would kind of act a bit like bubbling air through the system does.

ie it would release all the hydrogen/oxygen bubbles from their cathode/anode allowing more surface area for bubbles to form again.

maybe?


KSW

Ron

i know this isnt really electrolysis but

have you looked into bingo fuel? http://jlnlabs.imars.com/bingofuel/index.htm

1080litres/hour = 18 litres of gas a minute

should be enough to run the engine?


h2o2go

Ron
My take on why Garrett switched polarity was to reverse the transference (plating) that occurs on the electrodes.? I suspect that in 1935 there was not much available for material.? I have experimented with this and it does work.? I am not familiar with the material you are using but it sounds like you may have this problem licked ??? Where can I find out more about your material ?

THANX
Dave