Late Harvest Moon

[TechStuf]

I myself feels the urge for pinning it down to the exact scientific verification by a repeatable method, since its implications would result in a major change in the future actions for me and my family.

You see, that is why Great changes sneak up on mankind before his very eyes!  It is easier to believe small details one can wrap one's head around rather than deal with unbelievably large truths!  I and many others watched the sun rise over maine and set over seattle for months this year....and watched it rise at a crazy angle and set at the same angle, descending TO THE NORTH....and glow on the horizon for much of the night as it approached the NORTH POLE......at my elevation of 41deg North, I could see the after glow until nearly 1:30AM, losing it as it approached the pole, and could pick it up again at 3:30AM, increasing with brightness until it broke the horizon at the same weird angle, over Maine.  This went on for weeks surrounding the beginning of summer!

And you need exact science in order to make your decision?  Sometimes it's true what they say, the devil is in the details.

Sorry, but needing the reassuring shoulder pat of exact scientific detail in light of an avalanche of meaningful data just reminded me of a blonde joke I heard years ago....in no way do I make comparison between you and a falsely stereotyped blonde girl.  It's just that the moral of the story appears to me to be similar to the world's situation.

"Two blonde models were taking a walk in the countryside and came upon a set of tracks, which they began following.  Soon they began arguing as to what kind of animal they represented.  Bear! One girl shouted.  Deer! Yelled the other.  And so it continued....Bear! Deer! Bear! Deer!  Right on up until the train hit 'em.


At any rate, happy digging, and may the productive science by yours.


Blessings in your search for the 'evidence' you need.  May you find your answers quickly.

[gravityblock]

Scientists have got their terminology mixed. It appeared to them that the only thing that could conceivably maintain the Earth in orbit and account for its revolution was solar attraction, so they based all their calculations on this. In reality the opposite is the case. The Sun exerts a repulsive force on the Earth. Further, as it was obvious to them that a body could not maintain itself in an orbit when acted upon by a single force, they impute miraculous qualities to centrifugal force, believing that it was the second force that held the planets in their orbits. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Even if centrifugal force did give the necessary balance to a planet, which it does not, there is one glaring omission in this theory, namely the force that impels a planet in a certain direction.  They see that a planet is attracted, they also see that centrifugal force counterbalances this attraction, but they do not see that they have overlooked a third force which gives a planet movement. When one whirls a stone on the end of a string, the string represents the force of attraction and centrifugal force plays the part of repulsion, but the individual represents the third force which gives direction to the stone.

If y = F or f= y x M, then the element of propulsion F is necessary to make the Earth move, since it is this that imparts an acceleration to the mass M. It is logical that a body to which acceleration has been imparted should begin to move, but it is absurd to state that this acceleration could be initiated without a force and then maintained without one, especially as there is a loss of energy as the result of the movement of the body against the action of gravity.

Jupiter, with a mass 317 times greater than that of the Earth, should be subject to a far greater attraction than the Earth, yet the velocity in orbit is not high enough to counterbalance this and maintain it in orbit. This planet has a large mass and a low velocity. This being the case, either the orbital velocity of the Earth is too great for its mass, and it should be flung out of its orbit, or Jupiter's is too low, and it should be drawn into the Sun.  Note that I give Jupiter's mass as 317 times that of the Earth, which is based on the force of attraction of the Sun against centrifugal force. This figure, however, is incorrect.

You might raise the objection that Jupiter, with its large mass, revolves in an outer orbit according to the theory that spheres of greater mass are said to be more subject to the action of centrifugal force. Against this we have the case of Mars which is smaller than the Earth, yet is farther from the Sun, or again, the planets beyond Jupiter which are smaller than it, and yet revolve at a tremendous distance from the Sun. Moreover their velocity in orbit is very low. So that does not make sense either.

Scientists forgot, when dealing with the movement of planets, that energy must have been used up as a result of solar attraction working against the two centrifugal forces mentioned. If no explanation was given as to the source of power necessary to sustain the movement, then it is because the problem was based on false premises.

In the theory which I contend is the correct one, this force is derived from difference of energy potential which sunlight sets up by illuminating one face of the planet while leaving the other in darkness. A body which is balanced between two opposing forces (attraction and repulsion) has no weight and moves like a stone whirled round on the end of a string, the radius of its orbit being represented by the string. All the mechanical phenomena of the Universe are explainable.

GB

[TechStuf]

All the mechanical phenomena of the Universe are explainable.

Certainly, if one has the Time and Understanding.


Blessings

[gravityblock]

Certainly, if one has the Time and Understanding.


Blessings

With the correct understanding it would take very little time.  With an understanding based on overly complicated and false premesis, then even with an infinite amount of time, one would not be able to explain the mechanical phenomena of the universe.

GB

[TechStuf]

With the correct understanding it would take very little time.

Yes, but you forget you used those two little words, "all" and "universe".

All the mechanical phenomena of the Universe are explainable.

See my point?


lol