Trifilar Return Transformer

[the_big_m_in_ok]

Fatbird,,,you just replied to a computer generated message,ha,ha,ha

ie:Not typed in by a live person.A live person DID,,program it though.Indeed!

I like and wish I new more about this random sentence generation.code,,,,

Regards,,Fatbird,,,our technology out paces us,,,
Joe in Texas

Judges is right?  Looks like computer generation output of a video game commentary on the effect of children playing the game?
But, why is it there in the first place?  Does Stefan know about this?  That kind of thing is unnecessary on OU.

--Lee

[Judges]

Judges is right?  Looks like computer generation output of a video game commentary on the effect of children playing the game?
But, why is it there in the first place?  Does Stefan know about this?  That kind of thing is unnecessary on OU.

--Lee

Lee,you don't find it Interesting?

The content is Bullshit,,,but could you imagine ,putting all the words that came to mind for Over Unity,,then commanding the program to out legible sentences?

Joe in Texas

[the_big_m_in_ok]

Lee,you don't find it Interesting?

The content is Bullshit,,,but could you imagine ,putting all the words that came to mind for Over Unity,,then commanding the program to out legible sentences?

Joe in Texas

@Judges
Now, I can.
10-15 years ago I saw in a commercial writing magazine devoted to you selling what you write to publishers that software was developed to generate prose by inputting keywords into a program.  This might be that application.

I almost forgot about it.  Only seeing a demonstration here has reminded me of the incident.  You're correct in that regard, if that was your point.

We still don't need that on this site.  "Off-topic."

--Lee

[geotron]

I'm becoming less enthusiastic about sharing things
here when I see garbage floating around in some kind
of attempt to draw focus away from the subject at hand;
instead directing it towards a novelty gimick.

LEAVE this message thread if that's all you're going to do.

[ the_big_m_in_ok ] - The following will likely show a
better visual representation of what I'm getting at.

[the_big_m_in_ok]

[ the_big_m_in_ok ] - The following will likely show a
better visual representation of what I'm getting at.

Yes, geotron, I understand better what you're trying to do.
Being that patents are something I have more than a little experience with, you might look at the USPTO database and see if someone has come up with a design similar to yours?

http://google.com/advanced_patent_search  , for starters

I qualify my suggestion by saying that these patents (hundreds available) really aren't trying to achieve OU, but their descriptive text may allow you to look at a design in a different way?  There are certainly interleaved coil arrangements that step up voltage and there are split core designs that attempt to mitigate stray ringing or possible capacitance effects between coil turns, as an example.  Then there's always the elimination of CEMF/BEMF, which was usually considered undesirable by the inventors.

--Lee