a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[gravityblock]

@David:  I sent you a PM

@All:  Here's a video of my replication of the Baker's Device, YouTube - Baker's device 

I used the nylon fibers found inside a CAT 5 cable.  All I need to do now is to add a mirror to the nylon string to reflect the laser light, then seal it up so there are no air currents to affect the experiments.  I also need 4 ring magnets so the combined forces of the earth's magnetic field and those of the doughnut magnets almost cancel each other out so it will rotate quite freely and be the most sensitive.  This setup detected a magnet from 4 feet away without the nulling magnets in place.  It didn't take very long to assemble this apparatus and it was easy to build.

GB

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Sm0ky.  It constantly amazes me that mathematicians can determine things like the Casimir effect - and even more amazing - an accurate description of the periodic table - without ever being able to actually climb into an atomic structure and study it.  All branches of physics and it's multiple achievements are an enduring tribute to our scientific community and our Greats amongst them - and not to be belittled.  I'm very aware of this.

My interest - however - is still with outstanding questions.  You mention that it's possible to fire an electon into a proton.  Perhaps in our particle accelerators - and then under extreme velocities.  But my own understanding of this is that - under usual conditions - the electron is ultimately repelled - the closer it gets.  I'm more than open to correction here - as most of my knowledge of physics is gleaned from layman's literature.  And to verify this I'd need to look up a reference and I really haven't the interest or time.  But I've added this to my ever growing 'to do' list.

What I really wanted to do was to list some of the questions that I understood are still outstanding.  Here goes - to the best of my knowledge we do not know why the electron is precisely 1836 times smaller than a proton - yet has the identical but opposite charge.  Why the electron does not nosedive to the proton is still out there.  Partially explained as it's having a 'like' charge to some of the proposed quarks - which again is based on theoretical suppositions.  Nothing wrong with theory.  Just very difficult to prove.  Then there's the outstanding question related to the forces themselves.  No-one knows how they work - only that they do.  And right now the structure of the universe is somewhat topical as they've been obliged to propose an overriding universal expansion to override the 'attraction' of the gravitational force.  This analysis is based on measurements related to the red shift - but there are gross inherent contradictions that relate to empirical evidence - especially as this relates to the collision of galaxies.  But over and above all of this is the fact that neither classical and quantum gravity explain the mystery related to our galaxial masses that really should unravel and yet they don't.  This question is NOT answered by universal expansion.  It is only answered by the existence of some force that heretofore has not been factored in to our physics studies.  And it's getting a hard time amongst all academics.  There is still just a fringe group of astrophysicsts who acknowledge the evidence here.  When one considers that this problem has been put out there some 80 years ago, it shows the evident reluctance of mainstream to entertain new questions let alone new answers to those questions.  And finally is the outstanding question related to locality.  The simple fact is that paird particles can adjust their positions simultaneously at faster than light speeds.  This begs the final barrier that superluminal velocity is indeed possible.  This point is seldom referenced by mainstream and - like dark energy - it's only referenced in whispers.  LOL

Which, again, is why forums such as this rock.  I'm reasonably sure that we all prefer questions to standardised answers.  Clearly - until mainstream will revise those creeds related to thermodynamic laws then - we all definitely have the edge on them.  And more to the point is that we're all prepared to both ask the questions and find the answers.  Maybe not with the same flair and panache and technical rectitudes - but it still puts us streets ahead.  LOL.  We're leaning hard on those paradigms.  Very nice.



Regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@David:  I sent you a PM

@All:  Here's a video of my replication of the Baker's Device, YouTube - Baker's device 

I used the nylon fibers found inside a CAT 5 cable.  All I need to do now is to add a mirror to the nylon string to reflect the laser light, then seal it up so there are no air currents to affect the experiments.  I also need 4 ring magnets to null out gravity so it will be the most sensitve.  This setup detected a magnet from 4 feet away without the nulling magnets in place.  It didn't take very long to assemble this apparatus and it was easy to build.

GB

Well done GB.  It'll be nice to see measurements of Dave's rig when you get it.  Really well done. 

kindest regards,
Rosemary

[cletushowell]

Im trying to lock myself down like howard hughes
im a little too far over life itself right now
anyways smoky your real close to the ac
battery with aternating the caps between the coils
wit the power mangment control system
each cap can be released in order
as the others fill now i need to figure out how to fill
these caps from the moray cell .

2. The triangle was not very usefull mainly its because combined two shapes
if you change the bottom from a square to triangle
you see you can only have four triangles
then fill in the polarity of those four
you have the polarity of the flying triangle
now smoky if you can pulse the polarity
with the caps you can controll the gravity in
one triangle by pulsing the three caps
in the four different orders in sequence

3 the ability to seperate like hutchesion
does is the reverse of explosion
einstien stated a the flame cannot be controlled
I discovered the flame can be controlled
its thru the joe cell your creating a vacume
in the cylinder and imploding if you was the electricity
between the piston and spark plug in the vacume
pulling tge piston towards the plug
instid of the fire between the plug you get movement
something tesla could not do control
the sparks its thru direction by
imploding or moving the particles together
to eminiate the spark
4 the glimmer vibration sorry probly have the terms wrong
is when the oscilatio. Of the current is not correct there is
a vibration emmited a pulse this pulse is a strange effect
from what I can tell its just lost energy
not directed when i corrected the flow
of energy the pulse went away
basicaly it would be 1 or more of the energy
not in how do you say when colors dont match you shirt and pants
the clash i guess when energy dont match the cause that
vibration of not having the right color star between it
out phase i guess might explain it better
I dont beleive this thread has limits
because its the structure of everything.
5 oh so implosion pulls and aligns the attomic
particles they stay there till modified we
do everything the hard way heat cool pressure
hutchesion is controling more or less releasing tje implosion
of the center magnetic feild holding the structure together
this seperates the piston in joes car
allows it to go back around
then he inserts energy to pull it together
joe im shure did not understand
he was doing hutchesions experiment controlled and at high
speed but i think hutchesion did or does
he shows something in his notes about the stainless
car that runs free maybee hes the one emailing me
in a private email anyways I would like to build that joe cell
I think between it and spark phasing the capacitors we can set
america free from oil and paying for electricity
I put the demostrations on my
happy birthday post sorry some things I just cant solve sobber
its impossible have to slow the brain down enough to be paitient
then when im paitient I can usualy finish what I understand
but cant do maybee i should try these
electrical diodes and stuf drunk beings I cant build them sober
oh this is so frustrating not being able to build electrical boards

Im thinking this may help a full pipe is a
full ion flow a half pipe still flow ions but thru air
im thinking that the half pipes should
pick up the radiation from the granite
salt container then the top should not be cut
but maybey also even soldered to a v
so take daves pipes but leave a peice at the top
not cut in half so half the pipe is radiant and a portion
is circling that potion should now be useable one way or another
either direct or a secondary wire around it
oh i did something stupid i wound a fluorecent
with wire did you know you can get energy from
those tubes so i dont have a tesla tower but if i did
i could show you that lost vibration
picked up by the flourescent in air can be
harnessed by the wire around the light
i guess thats picking up the radiant waves it was a bitch to wind a
spriral florescent it didnt make as much as i wanted
proble because i used thermistat wire instid of
magnet wire well I gave you a lot hop it helps 

 

[cletushowell]

@rosemary
you dontderstand everything is different ech time i see it its like they cut peices from my side so im not ignoring you but did not have your response to answer your question im now frustrated but ill do it anyways.
your question
What I really wanted to do was to list some of the questions that I understood are still outstanding.  Here goes - to the best of my knowledge we do not know why the electron is precisely 1836 times smaller than a proton - yet has the identical but opposite charge?

the answer= 1836 =1+8=9 3 6 teslas 369 rev 18 there not exact smae there 1 off the 8


Why the electron does not nosedive to the proton is still out there.?
answer the proton and neutron cannot colide due to the 1 added to the system once this is done polarity is always seperated 3691888 after the 1 everything is always positive or double energy its ciclin back thru the 8 the 369 cirlcles back thru the 369


  Partially explained as it's having a 'like' charge to some of the proposed quarks - which again is based on theoretical suppositions.  Nothing wrong with theory.  Just very difficult to prove.  Then there's the outstanding question related to the forces themselves.  No-one knows how they work - only that they do.  And right now the structure of the universe is somewhat topical as they've been obliged to propose an overriding universal expansion to override the 'attraction' of the gravitational force. ?
Gravity is expanding the plasma earths sea of glass is expanding as gravit increases the green house gas the water is suspended longer as the sea turns to salt crystals the green house energy is then vibrated between the plasma and the earth this is the end result the sea crystals hold all the water in space.
This analysis is based on measurements related to the red shift - but there are gross inherent contradictions that relate to empirical evidence - especially as this relates to the collision of galaxies.  But over and above all of this is the fact that neither classical and quantum gravity explain the mystery related to our galaxial masses that really should unravel and yet they don't.  This question is NOT answered by universal expansion.?
you dont see the loops its not expanding or contracting its apearse to be based on the time and energy you evaluate it at the earth is constantly sending rocks to space why the grand canyon
does not build it own giant dam where did the dirt go the rocks I know it hard for you to get
but its the same result as coral castle but when the energy level is increased to a point the rocks build so much energy the shoot to space dislodge with energy when enough sediment is loose the rocks has more energy the the resistance it goes this happens at nigh due to temperature of air coller then the rocks and energy.

It is only answered by the existence of some force that heretofore has not been factored in to our physics studies.  And it's getting a hard time amongst all academics.  There is still just a fringe group of astrophysicsts who acknowledge the evidence here.  When one considers that this problem has been put out there some 80 years ago, it shows the evident reluctance of mainstream to entertain new questions let alone new answers to those questions.  And finally is the outstanding question related to locality.  The simple fact is that paird particles can adjust their positions simultaneously at faster than light speeds.  This begs the final barrier that superluminal velocity is indeed possible.  This point is seldom referenced by mainstream and - like dark energy - it's only referenced in whispers. dark energy is a joke a new scientific term to get more funding its all the same frequency whether you store it in a battery oil coal natural gas hydrogen a specialy formulated composite of shit that you calcuate converts the energy better its still all the same thing frequency split uvc to uvb tovc to lead all the way to silicon you have the plasma yes I have the formula no I dont have a lab yes they did split lead frequency clear to silicon so theres better solar times 10 your just going to buy there slowest computer first everyone is thats the going green scam unless we bust it first with good will and better intention people then getting rich.
in fact well all get rich because we will all stop paying iran just work together.

Which, again, is why forums such as this rock.  I'm reasonably sure that we all prefer questions to standardised answers.  Clearly - until mainstream will revise those creeds related to thermodynamic laws then - we all definitely have the edge on them.  And more to the point is that we're all prepared to both ask the questions and find the answers.  Maybe not with the same flair and panache and technical rectitudes - but it still puts us streets ahead.  LOL.  We're leaning hard on those paradigms.  Very nice.



Regards,
Rosemary