a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[david lambright]

hi everyone!....i just wanted to say thanks again to everyone who takes the time, out of their lives, to read this thread and post ANY ideas about this...and the replicators.....well there are no words that are adequate.....i have said this all before but, if this is nothing, it will fall apart....but if it is as i have been saying, it will continue to grow just as it has been doing.......TODAY IS THE DAY OF DISCOVERY......david

[twinbeard]

Hello Twinbeard and most welcome to our discussion.  Some very appropriate links.  Many thanks for that.

Hi Rosemary.  Its a pleasure to meet you.  Fabulous work you are doing!

They have actually photographed pictures of atoms - believe it or not.  It looks like nested eggs held in cottonwool - or morning mist.  Extraordinary photograph - but I can't for the life of me remember where I saw it.  Just have the picture of it welded on my mind.

I would love to see it.  Google Images cannot come up with a actual picture of an electron for me, which is what I was intending on referring to... not an entire atom.  If you find such an image, please let me know.  The thought was that the electron it itself comprised of many smaller quark type aetheric particles.

I think Dave or someone with a rig will need to do that thin film of ferrofluid that you recommended.  I must say I'd also like to know the outcome.

I'm just curious what the extent of the B field looks like, given that the flux, by my estimation, should not be able to escape what amounts to a toroidal core, yet the particular geometry of this device may be creating really interesting eddies.

Cheers,
Twinbeard

[cletushowell]

Not only did the goverment finish my flying triangle they
fucking landed it in fresno where i grew up
you could at least show it to me
damit 
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1175026/pg1

[sparks]

@Rosemary

   I believe Jeanna over in the joule thief thread posted pictures of an atom.  The surface of which is a series of triangular static lines encasing whirling circles.  Looks like little pyramids encasing spheres. A pyramid is a cool geometric shape it can encompass a circle with the circle meeting the pyramid surface at 5 points.  One in the middle of the base.   And 4 more at pi diistance from the ground to the touch on the four faces.   The pinnacle of the pyramid forms an axis for the encased sphere while the walls  and floor of the pyramid form a 3 dimensional support system for the encased ball of minimal contact.  You can put a sphere inside a square also but the pyramid is more interesting.  Any expansion or contraction of the sphere would be converted to moving the pinnacle of the pyramid up and down.  More or less converting the stress put on the sides of the pyramid into motion at the pinnacle. A little expansion of the sphere creates alot of movement at the pinnacle.
   @ all

     We are down wind of Leo and the two of us are heading towards a supercluster of galaxies beyond what is known as the Great Attractor.  The gravity from this dense cluster of matter is pulling the entire Milkyway there.  Since gravity is pretty quick way faster than the speed of light we can assume that this cluster of galaxies is still there even though slowass light is taking forever to get here.  The young cluster of galaxies we are seeing most probably exist as a super blackhole by now long ago gobbling up the hot matter and cooling it down considerably.  Gravity is an accelerating force.  It accelerates stuff aound here a 32feet per second unless you take the moon into account which slows this acceleration down.  Gravity like movement is a relative thing.  The more mass in a given field the more gravity.  To counter all this mother nature in all her wisdom produced antigravity.  This manifests in like charges being repelled.  There is no positive and negative there is just more or less electricity in a substance. The proton is assigned a positive charge.  Why because it has less mass density.  It is quite large compared to the electron yet it has equal charge effect.  This is because it has less mass density.  If it had the same mass density as an electron it would have the same charge state as an electron and would repel the electron.   A blackhole does not gobble up another blackhole.  We see a blackhole gobbling up the less dense matter surrounding the blackhole at the center of each and every star but blackholes are relavent to blackholes.  Once they have stripped the hot stuff it leaves the core of the star which is at the same mass density as the big black hole.  The two black holes then begin to accelerate away from each other on their way to creating new galaxies somewhere else in time and space.  There has to be antigravity or the big bang has to be repeating itself over and over and over again changing just a little bit every time.  Imploding and exploding so damn fast that all we see is minute changes dictated by whatever force is controlling the whole creator frequency.  Of the two sceanarios I would go with antigravity.  At least on the 7th day when the creator takes a snooze.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  @smokey

    The electromagnetic stimulation of radioactive decay can make anything radioactive by decreasing the angular velocity of electrons in the 1s orbital.  They have found this out and can now take radioactive waste and electromagnetically stimulate it until it drops below radiation levels of that you would find in a smoke detector.  What the problem is is control.  When a guy can whip up a device put it in his garage and change his human waste into enough energy to power the neighborhood they loose control.  They no longer have us working night and day paying electric bills and fuel bills and taxes on fuel and taxes on electricity and taxes levied on stuff we make and stuff we do.  We are free to go out and change salt water to fresh change a desert into a farmland change packaging and all our waste into fertilizers and raw materials to rebuild our infrastructures and new structures.  A world of so much there is no need for wars or depletion of natural rescources that cause wars.  I dont know about you but this is no longer a matter of if is it  possible it is a matter of who is in the way of building such a world and why.

Sparks - this is just such a nice post.  Definitely needs framing.  Here's my vision.  I see us carrying a convenient little golf ball sized sphere in our pockets.  Its a simple acryllic material embedding a free floating magnetic monopole - postioned between two fixed metal plates - and a switch which releases the clasp to let that magnetic monopole spin.  Then - when we want some tea - or when we want to cook our stew - we flip that switch and simply toss that little number into the water and wait for it boil.   

Got to be an improvement on all that wiring that keeps us grid locked.  LOL

Kindest regards,
Rosie