a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[david lambright]

hi jesus......just a thought....try holding a small neo magnet about 20-30mm from the device...reverse the magnet till you feel a slight repelling between the two.....observe while you are feeling that...try and keep the magnet pushing against the rings field......or try using a piece of quartz crystal near the device.....this also seems to help....david

[Hope]

These new links about pulsing liquid metals were great.   Silver had 6 pointed object and gold 7 pointed.  Can we assume that each atom has it's own matrix, lattice or what ever it may be called? 

Also I searched tree structures a bit and found a lot of references to "The Tree of Life" and found this one has a pyramid at the bottom.

[cletushowell]

Dave you mention crystals do you know how to reverse a hutchesion
crystal instid of transmitting the frequency
remove the frequency im asking because this is like the key to
using free energy removing stored frequency
so i can radiate rock i can send radio signals and receive those
but why cant i remove frequency from
something say lead its stated if you remove
energy from lead it turns to gold
now i dont think its lead but i do think
this is the key the removal of the -+
from the ring or structure of anything
has to be reverse of hutchesion
crystal with the formula if king midas was serinated
10 days with sound then was he charge with energy or if double the harmonic is twice the power can a lower harmonic remove
power leaving him with the harmonic frequency to turn
everything to gold i know how and why the water fixed it when he washed in the river but why the ten days why the sound
sound hutchesion crystals octaves are the key
must be how many circles till we get to
gold remove a octave must remove a circle the body
must be a ultimate battery dam brain polorization
polorization of samsons hair -ph+ph
like drugs testing
walking on water wheres the answer
serioisly i have it i just dont see it
one thing does everything in the universe
ill ask God again but hes probly just going tell me im to stupid to get it.
Sorry off topic maybee some one has the answer 

[Hope]

I found (more attachments) just now so I want to post a few more and also have a question.  If all matter has counter parts ( I hope this makes sense ) does the base 10 number system have to account of dual pairs of each numbers?  And if so is zero a duality also?  If it does not have a pair or ANY matter at all then maybe it can accumulate and not be attracted to either positive or negative.  The "glimmer" may be and accumulation of these neutral voids, which would seem to slow light passing thru it.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I found (more attachments) just now so I want to post a few more and also have a question.  If all matter has counter parts ( I hope this makes sense ) does the base 10 number system have to account of dual pairs of each numbers?  And if so is zero a duality also?  If it does not have a pair or ANY matter at all then maybe it can accumulate and not me attracted to either positive or negative.  The "glimmer" may be and accumulation of these neutral voids, which would seem to slow light passing thru it.

Hi Hope

I wonder if we have plus/minus and neutral. But neutral is the result of plus/minus?  Maybe?  Something like that anyway.

I think that light moves through a magnetic field in a straight line.  But when the magnetic field itself is disparate or disjointed or disconnected due to multiple variations in its structure - then light can no longer find that straight line.  And by forming those disconnected fields inside Dave's rig - a complete circle - then light entering the rig gets disconnected from the 'straight path' and finds it's exit in a variable path.  I just wish I could find that glimmer off more symmetrical arrangements that I can somehow get to prove this.  But the glimmer seems to require those asymmetrical shapes that Dave uses - those 'open ended' pipes. 

Anyway - that's what I think may be happening. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie

ADDED Btw.  What interests me most is this.  We KNOW that gravity bends light.  But apart from that NOTHING bends light.  If Dave is bending light with a magnetic field - then perhaps gravity and magnetism are the same thing.  It's something that Einstein explored and then ditched.  Why Dave's rig is so exciting is that - if this is the root cause of bending light - then it shows up gravity in a new perspective - a new LIGHT.  LOL

Rosie