a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[cletushowell]

Maybee you dont understand what I did thats ok
I guess many dont need math to do
miracles in things me I solve math just to solve
it there was really no problem I think it helps a lot
of things having the right answers now
to tell you the truth I couldnt even use
it I dont know how I know sparks and rose and hope
probly do or some computer program
or maybee if I was Given a problem
I could Give you the answer but I already did
Its the answer to everything except it cant make questions
I was hoping it helped thats all. If it doesnt
thats ok sorry I did my best. I tried to explain
why the cut works it fills the Gap in the middle
the energy depending on the number you want you
would cut the gaps in secuence like if your pipes could spin
like strings on a guitar to the numbers
you just find number 7 spin the pipes till all the cuts landed on 7
sequence thats how I beleive you can
maximize this matrix I dont think you could
ever tune it by testing because to hit 7 the cut in each pipe would be a different spot well good luck

[nievesoliveras]

What has happened with @lambright?
If he has posted something important it is very dificult to find it on the topic.

Jesus

[truthbeknown]

What has happened with @lambright?
If he has posted something important it is very dificult to find it on the topic.

Jesus

David posted last Thursday on this forum and another forum....This thread is getting cluttered.

J.

[Hope]

HEY  while we were working this, some nice guys figured out HHO production at 50 LPM at 50AMPS    Out of phase resonance (of the 316 Stainless Steel)  tubes excites the water between then a small charge can separate the HHO, look off the shelf mostly.   These guys have made it open source for us all.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yuN3pl7Vwk&feature=related

[void109]

@Cletus (or anyone else who's hip to this math mojo)

I watched your video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cn871D8NTE

I believe its the case that within any axiomatic system there exist patterns.  We use a base ten system in day to day life, I believe, because we happened to evolve ten digits on our paws.  If we had sixteen digits, we'd likely be counting in base sixteen, and I think even then we'd have patterns emerging there as well.

While these are neat tricks you can do when playing with numbers, is there any evidence that this system is useful or reflects reality in a meaningful way?  And is it even a system at all?  It seems like you're just pointing out the entertaining relationships between various numbers, its like a numerology party trick.

Faith is believing without evidence - I think faith is venomous and I cannot see it being of any help in what those here are trying to do.

Perhaps you want (read: should) start a new thread to discuss faith based mathematics and we could try to recover this thread as an exploration of the phenomenon David appears to have (re)discovered and replicated.  Most of this thread has become overrun with this divergent topic and I think it is deterring the original participants from engaging in this thread.  I know myself I have been dodgy of checking here as its usually just another full page of pseudo maths.