Self-Runner NS Coil Pulse Motor Live Video Stream. It's been going for months!

[Pirate88179]

Iota:

I agree totally with your post.  My first coil was only one layer so, naturally it had 2 wires at each end.  It still worked fine.  It did not have the power output of my 2nd coil which was 2 layers.  I never wound a secondary on any of my NS coils.  Now that Lasersaber has done this, I hope we can continue to discuss and experiment with what is happening here.

I also agree with those that say there is more than one thing going on with these coils....galvanic, telluric, induction...whatever but I am convinced it is not just any ONE thing.

The more folks that replicate this, the better and the more we will all learn.

Just like the JT topic, we went from making a basic JT and trying to figure out how to improve that to all sorts of wild, successful experiments that exceeded our imaginations on how they could be used.  I hope this can happen here.

Bill

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys - sort of on topic but not quite.  Laser posted on the 14th Sept that is rig has been running for 83 days.  TOMORROW  is the 21st Sept (those of us at this side of the globe).  OFFICIALLY THEREFORE tomorrow will be 90 DAYS RUNNING.  In my book that's the start of our spring and to those of you to the North - to your autumn - AND it's a WHOLE summer/winter SEASON PAST WHERE THAT NUMBER'S BEEN TURNING. 

Really nice stuff.
Regards,
Rosemary

[Pirate88179]

I agree.  Let's see a battery we can buy do this.

Tonight, I drink a toast to Lasersaber.  Very well done.

Bill

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I agree.  Let's see a battery we can buy do this.

Tonight, I drink a toast to Lasersaber.  Very well done.

Bill

INDEED  LOL.  I'll do the same.  To quote a less than charismatic personality - Bertie Wooster - 'toodle pips' laser and may your rig have many more seasonal birthdays.   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Magneticitist.  What an interesting post.

think about how long a rechargeable battery can last and think about what is actually taking place when we are charging it... this is something that i still do not fully understand, but i suppose you could say we are just sending "energy" from an external source into some capacitance where it is stored atomically. the actual electrolyte in a wet cell seems to me to just be some type of conductor with reactive resistance, or like a switching transistor almost. no current is moved across them unless there is a potential difference created at the terminals.

I was obliged to do a chemical analysis of a lead/acid battery just to get my head around the process.  The fact is that the net recharge only re-establishes the early imabalanced bonding in those molecules.  NO extra electrons in that mix.  They never actually move away from the cell itself - else there would be evidence.  There's none.  So in recharging?  What then is being added?  It certainly isn't electrons.  Yet the recharge energy can be applied from a plug source or from another battery - or, as we show - from the material of the resistor - such that it measurably degrades the material of the resistor.  But whatever it is that's being transferred - it certainly isn't electrons.  But I suspect I'm going on going on.  It's a pet beef of mine.

an SLA battery works with gases and lead/sulfur chemical reactions but theres still metal plates storing the charge. iv'e heard from people that the acid is actually storing the charge but this is not true because i have taken batteries and replaced their acid completely with tap water and it retained a good charge.

Indeed.  The point is this.  A flat battery can reconstitute the acid condition of the water that it's so pure you could drink it.  Yet every single electron, every single atom - in that entire mix - is fully accounted for.  Yet something was added to reconsistute the acid/alkaline condition.  It's that 'something'. 

these batteries are like perfectly made miniature antennas for energy.  why can we not say that atmospheric waves are traveling at a very high voltage but extremely low current that is not noticeable.

My take is that we're pretty well drenched in magnetic fields from our earth that ALL move in one direction.  In effect IF we had a magnetic field that orbited exclusively around the equator - for instance - we'd NEVER experience a charge imbalance.  It's the fact that we have all those fields ONLY going in one direction that  I think somehow establishes a voltage imbalance.  The second half of the orbit is hidden inside the structure of our Earth.  So.  It's a monopolar 'field'.  And before these efforts of the JT contributors - I think this is what is seen as a source of gravitational energy.  What you guys are showing is that it's got exploitable inductive properties.

because the stubblefield coil uses an iron wire parallel to its copper windings, it is a super efficient magnetic flux receiver and sender. it should be giving flux all around and not just at the core ends. all the field thats entering and coming from the copper is magnetically going straight into the iron windings also as opposed to just the core. likewise any spike it gives out will have a great field "push" from little draw.

I entirely agree.

why is the stubblefield not using the same premise as a grounded tesla aerial? an earth battery is the same thing but its using pre-charged elements.

Can't comment.  I know nothing about a grounded tesla aerial.  But I agree.  The earth battery must certainly be using charge and it's certainly coming from the earth.  I keep coming back to this.  The condition of 'binding' in any structure may be the result of magnetic fields that bind those atoms.  Think of how many such binding fields are holding this solid earth in some form of loosely bound amalgam - if this is right.  In which case - if they're simply all little magnetic fields - then that's certainly a very large source of those telleric currents.  The more so as they are aligned/misaligned with that larger - all encompassing magnetic field on our earth - with all that potential difference.   

im thinking because of lasersabers work and realization that the moisture is not so much a big part of it, or as i understand it more of a hindering addition, the actual earth-grounding of the coil may be receiving its benefits from the negative potential its receiving rather than any extra moisture?

Again.  I absolutely agree.  But there is also no question that water seems to accentuate - or to concentrate that effect.

Frankly this is one of the many reasons I'm so entirely engaged here.  I've long looked to the casimir effect as being proof of these fields.  And if they're orbiting - in any way at all - then we would NEVER find them.  We can only see a voltage imbalance - and an orbiting magnetic field would be ENTIRELY balanced.   Very interesting post there M'itist.  I think we're sort of on the same page. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary
edited