Eric the free energy skeptic

[firlight]

Eric
    I have replicated Stan Meyers WFC ,and  claim >300% overunity,how does that grab you?
Also in the past looked at some of your examples of failed replications ,you have to be a joke.
You really don`t know your science.
Best Regards Dave L.

[hartiberlin]

@Dave L.
Can you please post a few pics and test results of your WFC ?
Thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[Clara Listensprechen]

When most of us speak of 'FREE ENERGY' many are talking about getting energy from some previously uknown source such as Zero Point Energy or Ether Energy. Once the mechanics are known of how to use this energy then we'll quickly realize that it is free in the same sense oil is free energy. Also wind, sunlight, biomass, wood, coal, hydro, ocean waves, gravity, etc. are free energy sources.

For every energy harnessing devise there is an energy source. What's important is whether there needs to be a middle-man between the source and the end user. Other aspects are initial and on-going costs of production, along with dependability and availability.

An ideal device would be something that gains unending perpetual energy from a steady free source like ZPE or gravity.

Jim_Mich

I would prefer to introduce a more practical definition of what's "free" in "free energy"--making use of the chemical/mechanical actions that Mom Nature herself does all the time without our help or interference.  Mom Nature does what she does for you, you do a little bit yourself and voila, it's yours for the cost of your bothering to harness it.

For example:  when the sun shines, it heats up stuff.  Heat up water to vapor in the presence of iron and you WILL get hydrogen + rust.  No electrolysis involved.  Are you going to complain about the energy it takes to get iron?  It's still cheaper than drilling thru rock to get oil.

[JackH]

Eric

Your $10,000.00 is not worth it.  When you read the rules you place on the inventer it is impossable.   Most inventers are small time, in other words they just do not have the money to build such a machine that you require for this prize.   I have no dought no one has collected it.  Your requirements are to great and your prize money is to small.

I really think you need to get a life.

Later,,,,JackH

[FredWalter]

When you read the rules you place on the inventer it is impossable. Most inventers are small time, in other words they just do not have the money to build such a machine that you require for this prize.

If an inventor can't build a device that will fit within Eric's size constraints, that will produce usable power, then the invention either isn't "free energy", or it isn't economically feasible.

It isn't sufficient to be able to display overunity - you also have to be able to make a device to harness this energy, that costs less than other commonly available alternative energy devices, such as windmills.

BTW, Eric, you have a few spelling mistakes on your free energy contest page - for example "I would love their to be FE" - should be "there", not "their".