Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



My free energy experiment.

Started by stevensrd1, September 12, 2010, 11:07:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

stevensrd1

Ty, I got a good feeling about this newest design, considering the electron pump is more or less not draining the main batteries, and considering even if the bottom motor slows some over the hours,,the top motor will keep up the work. And also considering as I said if you take a motor and connect it to a battery with a meter connected. Leave the same things mentioned hooked up, let the motor drain the battery, you can also just drain a battery completely, that might even be better as Ive did it this way as well,,then with the meter hooked up, spin the motor by hand the same direction it was spinning when the battery was powering it,,and the numbers on the meter go up, as the motor is then acting like a generator and putting energy or power back into the battery as you spin it. So the top motor makes the bottom motor do this as well,,adding energy to the recharge loop. This test started around 4 pm,,and is still running, with the five recharging showing a meter reading of 1338. The proof however is not in the numbers,,contrary to what most would assume,,its in the amperage stored in the recharging batteries. That does not show up on the meter under a voltage reading, but an amperage test can be made with the meter after the recharge. I usually just use the main drain motor for a time run test, as it takes alot of amperage to run that motor. And like I said in previous post, that main drain motor can drain a fully recharged AA battery recharged from my ac recharger in like ten minutes, so I have an estimate of stored amperage by using the main drain on the recharged batteries. In the earlier experiments like the two bat recharging two bat experiment, I just swapped the main drained bats with the recharged ones,,and could run that a few times, tho each recharge that way was less as the cd motor consumed energy running. So this setup is different, I have ran a cd motor on a fully recharged AA battery with no load,,for over two weeks before, I did have a magnet on the rotor and a quartz crystal on that,,did the quartz or magnet contribute to its run time,,I have no idea lol. Point is there is little overall load on the top cd motor on my present experiment,,as the bottom cd motor want to run in the same direction, as its powered in the recharging loop,,so runtime should be longer,,and that will also contribute to overall recharge,,ok knows Im rambling,,so thanks for the post,,Ill report how this experiment this time turns out later..

stevensrd1

Heres an update, as of 9:12 pm, the meter readings are at 1346 for the five AA batteries recharging. I also did a reading on the main two AA batteries, even tho the mains are wired in series,,and the recharging bats in parallel, the mains give different readings for each battery, as usual my reading are done while the machine is running. For mains bat one,,as I call it is 1302,,and mains bat two is 1294. I would swear the thing has picked up speed, seriously. Anyway the test continues, more later..

stevensrd1

Another update,,bats recharging reading, 1357,,looking good I think, no noticeable speed loss,,possible speed increase, the speed increase I cant verify since I have no rpm meter. But either way it definitely has not slowed any, that Im almost sure of. If it has increased in speed I can not imagine how since the top motor is out of the recharging loop, even if the top motor and bottom motor are connected by the spinning cd disk.  Eventually it must slow and stop,,then will come the final test. I will use one recharged bat on the main drain motor time test,,and another I will even do a meter amp test on, and will post the results, Will post more later.

stevensrd1

I know Im posting to many updates lol,,but Im up anyway so nothig better to do. So heres another update,,recharging bats reading 1362 as of 2:12 am,,and no noticeable speed change in the spinning cd,,its been zooming since the start,,so would be hard to tell if it slowed a little anyway. More later..

stevensrd1

Update, recharging bats at 1367 as of 5:15 am,,experiment still running.