My free energy experiment.

[shylo]

Hi Steve ...are you saying you added a 2nd cd motor ....doubiling the load ,....but hooked it to add to the 1st load???............shylo

[stevensrd1]

Yep two cd motors connected at the rotors, one cd spinning in between them, same batteries as in the schematic,two in series recharging three in parallel,all is same, wired both cd motors so they both spin the cd in the same direction, in effect both cd motors are connected/ wired to each other, much faster recharge this way it seems,,more test to do,,it may not run as long as before,,not sure yet,,just started this one some hours ago,,so its the first test,,I was just amazed at how fast it recharges,,numbers read 1353 already,,with one cd motor that takes almost 12 hours to get that high, or longer,,but like I said got more test to do,,feel free to do your own on it. Was kind of neat I thought so posted it.

[stevensrd1]

This is very interesting I think. So I restarted the test this morning at 5:40 am,,the reason being I could not get an estimate of full run time since the main batteries I started the experiment with were not fully recharged, I had been using them for a reed motor experiment before that. Anyway So everything is the same setup as I mentioned in the previous post. Still using two cd motors, one on top,,one on bottom with a cd between them, both motors have their shafts connected to the cd motor. It spinning fast as can be and batteries read so far now at 1371. This is not a misreading caused by some stray ac frequency throw off or high voltage, Knows how such can screw up a reading. I even disconnected the recharging batteries to take a reading to be sure and they held at 1364,,they always drop a little when taking the recharger off. So they are recharging far more higher in numbers then my one cd motor experiment did. I will of course repeat the experiment again,,and maybe more to try to figure it all out. I will admit the top motor wobbles a little as its not evenly connected to the cd motor as the motor on bottom is, just used hot glue stick glue to melt the plastic gear part to the rotor. But this seems to cause no overall loss of spin. The top motor just rest there as its wires are strung over and clipped to the top of one of my digital meters tops by a close pin lol. But it hold the motor stable enough so it remains fairly still and cant twist to much. Thats all I can say about it I guess so far,,just did another reading,,time 10:56 on the computer,,recharging bats at 1371 and also did a reading on the main bats,,they read 2.46 since I half to read them on the DCV 20v setting. I read the parallel three batteries as one battery since there all connected on the DCV 2000m setting, I do that so I can see a 4 digit display and can tell if charging is going up or down as its much harder to tell on the 20v setting. Well thats all for now I guess,,will post more after the next run no doubt when this run ends.

[nievesoliveras]

Is it like this?

[stevensrd1]

The top and bottom part is right,,that side think is not, here is a jpg picture of it, it is not running in this pic. The time test ended on this around 2:00 pm,,so it runs less time then the one motor but recharges more, odd. Hope the pic is viewable,,it was on my camera. I would have got video but I got to get a firewire card it seems. I bought a dv cord, but thats for dv to usb,,my camera dont use that for video. Anyway Ill get a firewire card next month most likely. I have an older video camera that works, but video is not so grand on it.