Angular Momentum, Parametric Oscillator and Over Unity

[Merg]

Jovan Marjanovic -- Angular Momentum, Parametric Oscillator and Over Unity

The goal of this work is to present mathematical and experimental proof of getting energy surplus or over-unity energy out of gravitational field by using pendulum as parametric oscillator.
In this work author definitely proved that the law of conservation of energy is not valid where the law of conservation of angular momentum was valid.

In this work the author will discuss:

- the law of conservation of angular momentum,
- principle of getting energy surplus out of pendulum which works as parametric oscillator,
- angular momentum and conflict with the law of conservation of total energy in orbits  of central forces (gravitational, electrostatic, etc.),
- angular momentum and corruption of centrifugal force,
- experimental proof of increasing potential and kinetic energy in the same time when the law of conservation of angular momentum is valid.

Key words: angular momentum, total energy, over-unity, parametric oscillator.

The complete paper can be read on the next link (PDF - 253KB):
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Jovan_Marjanovic_Angular_Momentum_and_Overunity.pdf

[broli]

In the paper the thetherball like experiment was used as "proof". He writes:

"As expected, the weight really went up and velocity was increased first slow than faster and faster."

This is a very subjective conclusion. Nowhere do I see velocity data to back up this conclusion. A rotating object might appear slow or fast depending on its radius while still having the same linear speed.If the speed near the pole can be measured then conclusions can be formed.

[Mayo]

In the paper the thetherball like experiment was used as "proof". He writes:

"As expected, the weight really went up and velocity was increased first slow than faster and faster."

This is a very subjective conclusion. Nowhere do I see velocity data to back up this conclusion. A rotating object might appear slow or fast depending on its radius while still having the same linear speed.If the speed near the pole can be measured then conclusions can be formed.

You have scientific formula for velocity V = (R0 / R1) V0.

It is obvious that velocity will be increased when weight come close to the stick.
The experiment was just to prove that kinetic energy increase wasn’t happen on account of potential energy.

[broli]

You have scientific formula for velocity V = (R0 / R1) V0.

It is obvious that velocity will be increased when weight come close to the stick.
The experiment was just to prove that kinetic energy increase wasn’t happen on account of potential energy.

I have done an analysis on paper and to my surprise the forces cause the velocity to reduce. Your formula is when you blindly assume conservation of angular momentum holds which can only be proven by experimental data to end discussion. There are 2 cases:

Angular momentum is conserved thus kinetic energy is gained
Angular momentum is not conserved, due to "outside" influence, but energy is conserved

I think you can agree that forming a conclusion on an unmeasured quantity is not very scientific.

[Merg]

Update: Jovan Marjanovic -- Angular Momentum, Parametric Oscillator and Over Unity (Update Oct. 13, 2010)

http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Jovan_Marjanovic_Angular_Momentum_and_Overunity.pdf