Free Energy, Critical Thinking, and Skeptics

[spinn_MP]

Heh, I'm siding with OmniBot? Thanks for a good lough...

"It's just so utterly malicious it's reached a kind of art form."
You think so? 

Guess what... You do the "17*ou" miracle, clearly.. Even with the Fet's (they used to do it with the bipolar transistors like 2955/3055... In the old days. Surely, with a help of a "555"...) ...

And, I'll change my mind.
Fair?

Nevermind...

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Heh, I'm siding with OmniBot? Thanks for a good lough...

"It's just so utterly malicious it's reached a kind of art form."
You think so? 

Guess what... You do the "17*ou" miracle, clearly.. Even with the Fet's (they used to do it with the bipolar transistors like 2955/3055... In the old days. Surely, with a help of a "555"...) ...

And, I'll change my mind.
Fair?

Nevermind...

LOL.  It has been done VERY clearly.  But you're on Spinn.  We're getting this done on campus - so this time there'll hopefully - be ready acceptance.  God know's it's needed.

But I'm definitely on for it.  Just hope you'll tame that malice when we show all that evidence.     

Regards,
Rosemary

[truthbeknown]

Heh, I'm siding with OmniBot? Thanks for a good lough...

"It's just so utterly malicious it's reached a kind of art form."
You think so? 

Guess what... You do the "17*ou" miracle, clearly.. Even with the Fet's (they used to do it with the bipolar transistors like 2955/3055... In the old days. Surely, with a help of a "555"...) ...

And, I'll change my mind.
Fair?

Nevermind...

Yep  Yep........Promises Promises... no proof..then no point....It has been a good laugh....

Cough syrup for all?


J.

[spinn_MP]

LOL.  It has been done VERY clearly.  But you're on Spinn.  We're getting this done on campus - so this time there'll hopefully - be ready acceptance.  God know's it's needed.

But I'm definitely on for it.  Just hope you'll tame that malice when we show all that evidence.     

Regards,
Rosemary

Ok, ok... Just show your "all that evidence" of yours...

Regards and Cheers,

spinner

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Paul, in the hopes of getting this back on topic and abject apologies for that absurd diversion.

I get it that you consider a kind of 'motion' of the magnetic field - whether the magnet itself is moving or not.  Presumably then the flux is in motion?  I agree.  And I also agree that in as much as a magnet resists 'falling' from a fridge door - then it's definitely resisting the gravitational pull.  Since the gravitational pull is quantifiable, then presumably the amount of energy expended in resisting that pull equals or exceeds the force of gravity. That's surely quantifiable?

But when you talk about centrifugal force being the same as gravity - then I'm frankly lost.  I thought the centrifugal force inclines bodies to move outwards and away.  Where gravity - in contrast - pulls one inwards and towards.  What really puzzles me is that a rotating platform is proposed to be a possible 'artifiicial gravitational field' that would compensate for the required gravity on a space ship.  I can't get my head around it.  Unless the rotation is at some exotic axis to that artificial sense of 'ground' that's required.  In any event.  It's just one of many blind spots. 

I must say I've got my own take on the casimir effect which I also agree is a kind of magnetic flux - extraneous to the atom - that bonds atoms.  So.  I'm with you when you talk about atomic bonding.  It's just that I'm a bit pedantic and horribly simplistic.  So I actually envisage a kind of one on one field of flux particles that bind atoms together.  So.  Yes.  On this point I'm in absolute agreement - always assuming that we're talking about the same thing.  In effect the field would be actively holding or bonding with extraneous material - which is a kind of work.

And I'm not sure if we need acceleration to prove that work is being done.  Surely there's work in any self sustained orbit - such as our spin - or our orbit around the sun - or in the orbit of an electron - that you mentioned in your earlier post?  If it's moving surely that's proof of energy? - is what I think I'm trying to say.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary