Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



New permanent magnet motor on youtube from Roobert33

Started by hartiberlin, November 17, 2010, 05:47:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

Of course, this last anomalous time still begs the question as to what caused it? If that anomaly indicates that those rotations were faked then  how was that achieved?

LightRider

Quote from: FatChance!!! on December 30, 2010, 04:45:16 AM
I saw this remark at Youtube backup video of Roobert33's motor.
It sounds very likely.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bssBAb6EzM4

"Look at 2:29 just when his hand approaches to stop the rotor.
It's clearly visible that the rotor slows down well before his hand touches it.
In my book this means he switched off an external power source a bit to early,
perhaps hidden below the table, and the rotor slows down before he can reach it."


From the analysis, speed remains constant (125 RPM) until the end...

...at that time "the end" (the last cycle) the speed is reduced to 88 RPM probably because of the contact with his hand.

Thank you,

Happy New Year 2011 to all,
That the collective genius opens our eyes to new avenues.

LightRider

Omnibus

Quote from: LightRider on January 01, 2011, 01:08:24 AM
From the analysis, speed remains constant (125 RPM) until the end...

...at that time "the end" (the last cycle) the speed is reduced to 88 RPM probably because of the contact with his hand.

Thank you,

Happy New Year 2011 to all,
That the collective genius opens our eyes to new avenues.

LightRider

Could you please indicate at what point on the graph does the contact with the hand occur? I remained with the impression that the sixth full turn (the anomalous one) took place before the contact with the hand and that confirms @FatChance!!!'s observation.

LightRider

Quote from: Omnibus on January 01, 2011, 02:02:47 AM
Could you please indicate at what point on the graph does the contact with the hand occur? I remained with the impression that the sixth full turn (the anomalous one) took place before the contact with the hand and that confirms @FatChance!!!'s observation.

@Omnibus :
The contact with the hand occur => at the largest pink dot inside the red circle. Accuracy is approximately to hundredths of seconds.
So, the contact with the hand occur exactly in the middle of the last complete revolution.

- the last complete revolution lasted 680 millisecond (not even a second)
- before the last cycle no noticeable slowdown ... a constant speed of 125 RPM

In very clear words, the slowdown seems appears exactly when the engine is touched.

I regret that my words have misled you, I hope it is more understandable now.

Many thanks,
LightRider

Omnibus

@LightRider,

Thanks for the clarification. That's a complete turnaround from what I understood initially. Honestly, when @FatChance!!! mentioned his observation I watched the vid at 2:29 and somehow it appered to me that he may be right. I was even thinking of extracting that short piece and having it looped so that I can observe it over and over again. You came up with a real solution, however, and your superb quantitative data put that point to rest. Of course, I'd like to hear also what @FatChance!!! thinks about this. Thanks againg for the great job.