Selfrunning HHO system with 400 Watts additional output

[questioneverything]

@questioneverything

let me ask a question?  or two ......

First, present scientific theory suggests that electromagnetism is the basic building blocks of the Universe and science.  Electricity and magnetism.  The question is what if there is actually a third?

Something that Stan Meyer, Nikoli Tesla(who I named my first born son after), and even you have alluded to, even fast freddie, as well as many in the effort to create amazing results.

I personally do not believe in over-unity.  However I do believe we have not discover all there is to know about energy and how it may be harnessed.   I have studied forum after forum, book after book, inventor after inventer, pioneer after pioneer and have come to one simple conclusion.  We are missing a chunk of the puzzle.  Men like Tesla and Meyer only proved that we do not have all the facts to prove that for every action there is an opposite an equal reaction.  How did they create an action that proved the reaction?

I have read every single post on this thread.  Amazing results on the trolley from lab to elevator, to ....    The naysayers and the proponents.  Everyone has an opinion.  You see what is on the trolley, build your own.  Prove or disprove.  Test and ask questions.

Some folks only wish to rip apart other folks research.  Ignore them.  Some folks wish to share their research,  share back with them.  Some folks wish to share overviews but not detail, try to replicate on your own.  Try yourself, and fail or succeed, but try.

I am build a 80 cell "brick" presently.  If it performs for size and current it will put my chevy suburban at 50 miles per gallon.  No it is not pure HHO, but it saves me enough to pay for some more research into HHO.

There is no third energy in the sense you speak of. That proverbial 3rd rail is actually a combination of the other 2. It is in effect a virtual 3rd rail.

First, it's Nikola, not Nikoli. Look at any of the old documents with his signature.

We do have that missing puzzle piece, but the establishment will not allow us to use it. It is to threatening to their very existence. It's why Tesla has been all but erased from history. They don't want people to realize their true potential to crack mother natures riddles.

You can not see the truth of that 3rd rail because your looking at it from the wrong angle. The entire universe and life it's self are a duality, two, but if you bring the 2 together in 1 system you get 3. This is where I wind up questioning....what if 2+2 isn't 4, what if it's actually 22?

I quit dealing with water based experiments when I lost control of a submerged plasma spark that drove the water temp to super-heated in a matter of seconds. It is way to dangerous for me to even want to continue so I started focusing on electromagnetism, and discovered that virtual 3rd rail when studying a car alternator that I had removed the coils from the stator in.

Later on I found out that it was originaly a discovery made my Tesla, but never documented, so it kindda killed that ME feeling, but it is sound.

There are 3 ways to disprove over unity. Efficiency, free energy word play, perpetual motion word play.

But only 1 way to prove it. Co-efficient of performance, or C.O.P.

Efficiency is a rating of losses in any given system, NOTHING is free even if it's so close the line is blured, and NOTHING can run forever. Batteries break down and die, machines break down and fail, and time deteriorates all things.

But C.O.P. rates total energy out compaired to what YOU YOURSELF supply. If you supply 1/2 energy input and the other 1/2 comes from the environment (earth batteries, solar, wind, radiant, water...ect) that YOU didn't supply, you get a C.O.P. of 2 in a perfect system. THEN 1 can run the system in a closed loop while 1 is free to utilize.

If you want to know EXACTLY how to do this, email me and I will send non-disclosure and non-circumvention agreements. This is just to ensure people keep their mouths shut so the wrong people don't catch wind of it indirectly.

The forms are from a company in another state, but I will be whiting out their info and filling in mine. Already had 1 guy splitting hairs about this. His loss.

babygirl8181980@gmail.com

[Les Banki]

@Les Banki
Thank you sir for sharing that info[reposted below],I will be sure to study

Chet

ramset (Chet),

I am pleased that at least ONE person (you) is prepared to spend a few minutes to read/study those files!

I write these very detailed circuit descriptions mainly for the benefit of others but they also serve to refresh my own memory.
As the years pass, my designs getting more and more complex.
Sometimes I need to look at a design which I have done perhaps a year (or more) ago and I find myself scratching my head:
"How the hell is THIS supposed to work?"

A quick read of my own description and I 'get it'!
Further, these descriptions have another, very important purpose!
They save me repeatedly answering a LOT of questions!
Now, when someone is asking a question, I can simply say:
Please read my thesis on the subject and/or the circuit description!

Since no circuit description will make any sense without the circuit diagram(s), I have attached the ones related to the ignition/injection process.

Please keep in mind that these circuits are already working but they will be altered (and circuit descriptions edited) in order to match the feed-back loop I am in the process of designing.

The MAIN change will be to try to run the ignition/injection sections on a 5V supply since ONE device (Digital Potentiometer) is rated at only 5V. (All the other ICs work happily on 12V!)

More about this later....

helmut,

Thanks for your post.  My sentiments exactly.....!!
Oh, don't worry about your English, it is perfectly understandable! 
(English is NOT my native tongue either but my 5th language....)

questioneverything,

"I'm an ASE trained mechanic, exactly what is the state of ignition flame front and it's behavior at the moment of ignition?"

How would I know?  I am not a mechanic....javascript:void(0);
Just kidding!

In his last post on this thread Stefan was/is SPOT ON pointing out that HHO does not burn but DETONATES!
In case you don't know this, the detonation speed of good quality Hydroxy (HHO, Brown's Gas, whatever name you care to put on it)
is somewhere between 3000m to 10000m per second, depending on certain factors.
Due to this PHENOMENAL speed, the kinetic energy is ENORMOUS!!
Unfortunately for us, we are only able to utilize a small fraction of it!
At atmospheric pressure, even a very low energy static spark is enough to detonate this gas!
These factors seem to be overlooked by the 'skeptics' and the "know-all" armchair 'experts'!

C.O.P. of 1 is considered unity. Need I remind you that your houses heat/AC pump operates between 3-4?

Solar, wind, and hydroelectric are considered C.O.P. infinity systems. 1 simple fact people keep over looking to try to push there misconceptions on truly open minds. You on an over unity forum trying to say over unity isn't real.

Doesn't that seem kindda redundant and stupid? Who the hell are you to say the world top quantum physicists are liars?

Excellent!!

All,

Please have a close look at this topic/thread!
Since it was started by Stefan a few days ago, only a few posts are on topic!
The rest is bickering about definitions, name calling, etc.
I rest my case....

Best regards to all,
Les Banki

[questioneverything]

questioneverything,

"I'm an ASE trained mechanic, exactly what is the state of ignition flame front and it's behavior at the moment of ignition?"

How would I know?  I am not a mechanic....javascript:void(0);
Just kidding!

In his last post on this thread Stefan was/is SPOT ON pointing out that HHO does not burn but DETONATES!
In case you don't know this, the detonation speed of good quality Hydroxy (HHO, Brown's Gas, whatever name you care to put on it)
is somewhere between 3000m to 10000m per second, depending on certain factors.
Due to this PHENOMENAL speed, the kinetic energy is ENORMOUS!!
Unfortunately for us, we are only able to utilize a small fraction of it!
At atmospheric pressure, even a very low energy static spark is enough to detonate this gas!
These factors seem to be overlooked by the 'skeptics' and the "know-all" armchair 'experts'!

Excellent!!

All,

Please have a close look at this topic/thread!
Since it was started by Stefan a few days ago, only a few posts are on topic!
The rest is bickering about definitions, name calling, etc.
I rest my case....

Best regards to all,
Les Banki

First, in an ICE you want combustion, NOT detonation. THAT is the problem with your ignition. Try injecting a little steam to slow the process from detonation to combustion.

Second, in now way did I call him stupid, I was referring to his statements, not him. For all I know he may be a collage professor. Such a shallow perception of things is why people continue to overlook the most simple answers.

I've left a trail of bread crumbs 1/2 mile wide, and still no one here has followed it, and the few that emailed me, 1 of them was a headhunter who is now shipping me an oscilloscope and several meters, along with a little funding to get the final parts needed to make it a full blown Tesla based system.

Like I said many times before, I don't give a flying fu** if you believe me or not, it's Tesla's work, not mine. I'm simply bringing it to light since Tesla left it undocumented.

[ray8abit]

@Les Banki

I am only a year into studying hho.  i was able to see you work in a couple other forums and have been intrigued by your work. 

I am using an old diesel four stroke engine/generator 5 kilowatts for my experimenting.  You are stating the flamewall is 3 to 10k per second detonation which is obviously well above diesel combustion.  What do you say to injecting water or steam to slow down the detonation to combustion fronts to drive the pistons?

[questioneverything]

@Les Banki

I am only a year into studying hho.  i was able to see you work in a couple other forums and have been intrigued by your work. 

I am using an old diesel four stroke engine/generator 5 kilowatts for my experimenting.  You are stating the flamewall is 3 to 10k per second detonation which is obviously well above diesel combustion.  What do you say to injecting water or steam to slow down the detonation to combustion fronts to drive the pistons?

Way to change someone elses post to look like it's yours! What a fraud!