The paradox of overunity

[Gwandau]

Hey dear participants in this energetic discussion,

I believe we are out in real deep waters here.

How on Earth would it be possible to ascertain that there is no pre-existing energy reservoir fueling the OU device?

I mean, just the fact that we do not detect any presence of an energy source does not
prove that there is no source.

What is not known does not exist???

To prove the total absence of a source, you need to know everything there is to know about our universe which of course is impossible,
and most certainly for a primitive species like the human race, who just have started fiddeling with the uppermost top of the iceberg of knowledge.

So the present level of this discussion seems a bit futile.

Gwandau

[Omnibus]

denied. logical fallacy, red herring (a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. the basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic).

let me refresh your memory omni. you have shown no evidence nor provided a single proof that indicates these alleged OU machines do not deplete a pre-existing energy reservoir despite your claim that you have.

That's gibberish. You'll get this response every time you post here.

[WilbyInebriated]

Hey dear participants in this energetic discussion,

I believe we are out in real deep waters here.

How on Earth would it be possible to ascertain that there is no pre-existing energy reservoir fueling the OU device?

I mean, just the fact that we do not detect any presence of an energy source does not
prove that there is no source.

What is not known does not exist???

To prove the total absence of a source, you need to know everything there is to know about our universe which of course is impossible,
and most certainly for a primitive species like the human race, who just have started fiddeling with the uppermost top of the iceberg of knowledge.

So the present level of this discussion seems a bit futile.

Gwandau

indeed. similar to the question of whom will be standing at point infinity to say 'yup, it's perpetual...' 

of course omni is claiming that he has ascertained that there is no pre-existing energy reservoir fueling the OU device... which, as you described, is obviously ludicrous. so here we are, trying to teach omni what a cogent reply is.

thanks for yours.

[WilbyInebriated]

That's gibberish. You'll get this response every time you post here.

no that is a cogent response. i called your fallacies out for what they are and restated my position. your continued use of logical fallacy as a response and your continued refusal to present said evidence or proof will now be accepted as a tacit admission that you cannot provide said evidence or proof.

[Omnibus]

your continued use of logical fallacy as a response and your continued refusal to present said evidence or proof will now be accepted as a tacit admission that you cannot provide said evidence or proof.

This above is spam.