Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Homopolar torqueless gear generator.

Started by broli, December 25, 2010, 04:32:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

broli

To all whom it's concerned if you want a very condensed and well written document on the history of the physics behind such things as the homopolar mo./gen., rail guns and other similar tech read this thesis:

http://www.df.lth.se/~snorkelf/LongitudinalMSc.pdf

I also suggest to research some of Jorge Guala-Valverdea work.

The above will give you a very good base to truly understand the real physics and nature of the tech.

Omnibus

@broli,

Thanks a lot for the link. Brings back memories when we used to gather in Peter Graneau's office at the Northeastern U. in Boston for discussions. He had just invited Assis form Brazil as a visiting scientist. Those were wonderful times. Long gone.

I hope you're familiar with Konstantin Meyl's work on the same topic and the criticism of it by Bruhn. Would be curious to know your take on that.

Liberty

Quote from: exnihiloest on December 31, 2010, 09:20:12 AM
You think wrong.

As I say that a homopolar generator works according to conventional laws of physics, it is only you who imagine witchcraft.

A Faraday disk can be used as generator or motor.

In generator mode, the Lorentz force F=q*v.B makes the electrons flowing radially. We can rewrite the equation by using preferably the Faraday's law: (1) e=B*(dL.v) where dL is a radial segment, v the linear speed of electrons, both being vectors and their product is vectorial. Here v and dL are perpendicular.

In motor mode, the easiest way is to used the Laplace's law which here gives the tangential force acting on a current element dL: (2) dF=I*(dL.B). dL and B are also vectors and perpendicular.

Now if we loop the external circuit in order the generator disk to provide a current, from equation (1) we get the current I that is drawn: I=e/R, R being the resistance of the circuit.
We put this current I in equation (2) in order to get the counter force which generates the counter torque. And by simply integrating along the radius the product of the force dF by the distance from the disk's center, we get the counter torque.

What you missed is that as soon as a Faraday disk is used as generator and a current is drawn, then the current makes the Faraday disk to function as a motor whose torque opposes the  torque you apply to rotate the disk. Both phenomena work together.

The fact that you group 2 disks doesn't change anything in the fact that the two counter torques still apply to each disk. If you are unable to understand the theory, you should build your "invention", make a real device, and observe what will be going on (nothing new), instead of providing a pretty but useless cartoon.

"In generator mode, the Lorentz force F=q*v.B makes the electrons flowing radially."

Just a question/statement.  Could this step be viewed as:  The shortest (lowest resistance path) on the spinning disk/magnet is from the center of the disk to the outside.  This "path" creates a wire on the disk in essence that passes through the magnetic field, which collects a charge and also creates an electron path for power to flow when a load is applied.  It appears that the magnetic field has the effect of suspending the charge on the area of the disk, avoiding discharge through the disk, rather preferring the low resistance path of the "wire" to the load.

Liberty
Liberty

"Converting Magnetic Force Into Motion"
Liberty Permanent Magnet Motor

broli

Quote from: Omnibus on December 31, 2010, 05:00:28 PM
@broli,

Thanks a lot for the link. Brings back memories when we used to gather in Peter Graneau's office at the Northeastern U. in Boston for discussions. He had just invited Assis form Brazil as a visiting scientist. Those were wonderful times. Long gone.

I hope you're familiar with Konstantin Meyl's work on the same topic and the criticism of it by Bruhn. Would be curious to know your take on that.

Yes I'm a little familiar with Meyl. But his work is based more on time variant EM, while ampere's original formulation relates to time invariant EM. The force between current elements to be exact.

broli

Quote from: Liberty on December 31, 2010, 05:54:17 PM
"In generator mode, the Lorentz force F=q*v.B makes the electrons flowing radially."

Just a question/statement.  Could this step be viewed as:  The shortest (lowest resistance path) on the spinning disk/magnet is from the center of the disk to the outside.  This "path" creates a wire on the disk in essence that passes through the magnetic field, which collects a charge and also creates an electron path for power to flow when a load is applied.  It appears that the magnetic field has the effect of suspending the charge on the area of the disk, avoiding discharge through the disk, rather preferring the low resistance path of the "wire" to the load.

Liberty

You must first see why the voltage is created, the rest is just standard ohm's law.

The generator I posted above has some real caveats. But I would be surprised if anyone could point them out. As I made one assumption which could only be verriefed experimentally or using a finite current element simulation software. I tried to make the later but it got a bit too complex. So I guess I'll have to go with the former now.