Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Advancements in Vortex Mathematics

Started by GregorArturo, January 04, 2011, 07:12:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
User actions

void109

#10
January 05, 2011, 01:30:25 PM
I'm with Omnibus on this one.  I've been intrigued by this whole notion of vortex based mathematics for awhile.  Ultimately it has just led to my own frustration - as I've yet to see anything that correlates the 'math' to anything physical and real.  Is it popular because of the fancy numerical associations it produces?  Science or numerology?  I haven't seen anything yet that indicates it is science.

How do you use this tool (VBM) to make physical predictions?  You know, so we can test those predictions. :)

Jimboot

#11
January 05, 2011, 04:13:20 PM
Whilst i don't pretend to understand the more complex aspects of the maths i have enjoyed winding several coils based on them for my pulse motors & loudspeakers. In my limited experience they are so much more efficient than any other coils I've used. So I've confirmed for myself some of the initial claims around efficiency of vortex math based coils, so Im prepared to be further intrigued :)

Gwandau

#12
January 05, 2011, 05:16:42 PM
If you don't know about Marko Rodin, you just have to check this:

http://www.rense.com/RodinAerodynamics.htm

He is the one guy most deeply into vortex mathematics and its applications.

Home Page:

http://markorodin.com/1.5/

Also there is several real intriguing lectures by him on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K93dL65Q724


Omnibus

#13
January 05, 2011, 05:45:30 PM
Quote from: Gwandau on January 05, 2011, 05:16:42 PM
If you don't know about Marko Rodin, you just have to check this:

http://www.rense.com/RodinAerodynamics.htm

He is the one guy most deeply into vortex mathematics and its applications.

Home Page:

http://markorodin.com/1.5/

Also there is several real intriguing lectures by him on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K93dL65Q724

I don't see any reason why one interested in OU should ever spend time watching these videos? Where is the experimental proof that coil or approach has anything to do with OU?

Gwandau

#14
January 05, 2011, 07:37:28 PM
Seems to me Marko Rodin is onto the very fabric behind our universe.

The geometry of energy fields points clearly towards the vortex concept.

Just look at anything, from atomic spin structures to galaxies.

Thus OU-like effects are very likely to relate to the ever present vortex geometry.

Omnibus, I take the liberty to remind you that we are here to keep doors open.

Gwandau
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
User actions