Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Advancements in Vortex Mathematics

Started by GregorArturo, January 04, 2011, 07:12:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

Quote from: Gwandau on January 05, 2011, 07:37:28 PM
Seems to me Marko Rodin is onto the very fabric behind our universe.

The geometry of energy fields points clearly towards the vortex concept.

Just look at anything, from atomic spin structures to galaxies.

Thus OU-like effects are very likely to relate to the ever present vortex geometry.

Omnibus, I take the liberty to remind you that we are here to keep doors open.

Gwandau

That's fine, I'm all for that. But the discourse should be reasonable. Just seeming analogies aren't enough to convince a scientific mind that there is anything pointing to the fabric of our universe in those ideas. That's what I'm getting at. Pure mathematical constructs are just one side of the issue but without predictive power which can be tested experimentally they are worthless even if these constructs constitute a beautiful structure in themselves.

Gwandau

Omnibus,

I totally agree, theory is of course secondary to real experiments.

But there are two road towards discoveries.

One road starts with a theory that dawns upon ones mind, call it intuition.

Any theory is worthless without being backed up by experimental proof, of course.

The other road is the incidental discovery through experiments, which thereafter
needs a theoretic sceleton to make sense.

What Marko Rodin has found seems genuine and novel, since his ideas are not based
upon any mathematical construct as such, but are directly relating to sequential values
repeating themselves again and again indefinitely.

I just mean that this unprecedented approach to numerical values seems to unveil
uncharted realms of knowledge, which may initiate intriguing experiments.

Additionally his toroidial coil construct is expressing a very interesting "noise free"
electromagnetic surrounding, which eliminates any need for shielding as in common windings.

Gwandau

Omnibus

I agree. Toroidal coils exhibit very interesting properties. Case in point -- Steorn's experiments. I don't know what the additional aspect the Rodin coil brings in that can supplement what we already know about this type of coils such as the confinement of the field within the coil, eliminating the need to shield it from the surroundings. That can only be established experimentally and I don't see for the time being how the numerical approach provides evidence for any new, hitherto unknown but real behavior of these coils.

Jimboot

I get my little pulse motor running up around 10000 RPM on 1.2 watts using a rodin coil. I have not been able to achieve the same results on any other coil & the rodins use a very small % of copper in comparison. So that in itself is worthy of investigation IMHO purely from the cost saving benefit alone.

Omnibus

Quote from: Jimboot on January 05, 2011, 11:57:03 PM
I get my little pulse motor running up around 10000 RPM on 1.2 watts using a rodin coil. I have not been able to achieve the same results on any other coil & the rodins use a very small % of copper in comparison. So that in itself is worthy of investigation IMHO purely from the cost saving benefit alone.

Definitely. Isn't there a way to carry out proper power balance measurement on your motor? I'd be most willing to help in that, if you don't have DSO and adequate probes. Would you care to mention where you're located if you decide I can be of any help (or maybe send me a pm)?