i have proof!

[david lambright]

hey, this is part of a thesis/ theory that i have been working on forever it seems...i think that these ideas will change physics...i hope you too will find simple answers to the problems that plague the classic and quantum models...  there are 2 energy streams and they are polar by nature....the singularity is split into a ring...this ring is bi-directional, super-fluid and equal, effectively cancelling each other....twist this into an 8 [infinity] and you have two lobes..take a pen...draw an infinity sign...there are 2 streams so draw it again...the streams still cancel each other...take your pen and draw that sign again this time draw  two circles on top of each other and then at the point where you started and draw two more circles finishing the infinity sign...you see the lobes do not cancel now but you have a direction to move from< the point>....move either direction and we have attraction/repulsion  N and S,magnetism etc....movement causes this  attraction/repulsion so one lobe is bigger ...doppler...[that is why one pole is stronger}...so now we see that from the singularity we get a ring [or disc]  bi- dimensional/directional..add movement and you will have time behind you, space ahead....the only reason we experience any of these forces is the difference in lobe size ...due to acceleration/spin,one lobe is dominant [red shift problem]....this theory was written by david lambright on Thur.1/20/2011... we KNOW about super fluidity, conductivity etc...these forces are all easily manipulated...convection is temperature dependent  but bi-directional....the floor you  stand on consider even or rest temperature, and one foot =1 degree....bring a point into the room five degrees warmer, and you will have a spike or if colder a pit...vortex/anti vortex...convection pulls down the point till it reaches an even temp...this is the same mechanism that is gravity....one lobe bigger than the other to create the attraction/repulsion that we feel as gravity..there are two supreme forces that all the forces arise from ...the math will prove this....    ...the 90 degree or linear to radial interaction;...a particle, at absolute zero, moving through space becomes a line....any interaction with anything takes  energy from it, but since energy can only be transfered,any interaction with a boundary, turns into rotation, bi directionally....there will be a lot more about this and the experiments that led me here....thanks...david 

[CompuTutor]

I'm sorry to do this, really I am.

I see it was written in a free-thought,
"As thoughts come to mind" type of style.

But I couldn't seem to force myself
through that entire Wall-o-Words....

If I sliced in the wrong spot(s) below,
I am sorry about that.

hey,
this is part of a thesis/ theory that i
have been working on forever it seems...
i think that these ideas will change physics...
i hope you too will find simple answers to the problems
that plague the classic and quantum models...

there are 2 energy streams
and they are polar by nature....
the singularity is split into a ring...
this ring is bi-directional,
super-fluid and equal,
effectively cancelling each other....

twist this into an 8 [infinity]
and you have two lobes...
take a pen...draw an infinity sign...
there are 2 streams so draw it again...
the streams still cancel each other...

take your pen and draw that sign again
this time draw two circles on top of each other
and then at the point where you started
draw two more circles finishing the infinity sign...

you see the lobes do not cancel now
but you have a direction to move from <the point>....
move either direction and we have
attraction/repulsion  N and S,magnetism etc....

movement causes this attraction/repulsion
so one lobe is bigger ...doppler...
[that is why one pole is stronger}...

so now we see that from the singularity
we get a ring [or disc] bi-dimensional/directional...
add movement and you will have
time behind you, space ahead...

the only reason we experience any of these forces
is the difference in lobe size ...
due to acceleration/spin,
one lobe is dominant [red shift problem]....

this theory was written by
david lambright on Thur.1/20/2011...

we KNOW about super fluidity, conductivity etc...
these forces are all easily manipulated...

convection is temperature dependent
but bi-directional....
consider the floor you stand on even
or (a) rest temperature,
and one foot = 1 degree....
bring a point into the room five degrees warmer,
and you will have a spike
or if colder a pit...
vortex/anti vortex...
convection pulls down the point till it reaches an even temp...

this is the same mechanism that is gravity....
one lobe bigger than the other to create
the attraction/repulsion that we feel as gravity...

there are two supreme forces that all the forces arise from ...
the math will prove this...
the 90 degree or linear to radial interaction;...

a particle, at absolute zero,
moving through space
becomes a line....
any interaction with anything
takes  energy from it,
but since energy can only be transfered,
any interaction with a boundary,
turns into rotation,
bi directionally....

there will be a lot more about this
and the experiments that led me here....
thanks...
david

This has been been a problem in earlier years,
before computers could easily render almost any
3D representation of interactive linears/logs.

Many families of math were created originally,
just to allow the ability to define something.

But the really hard thing
is finding the simple thing.

There can be no representation
without a few things first.

A point (or more) of reference(s) to view from,
and motion or vector(s) in relation to that/them.

Something as simple as the fact that
differing forms of energy flow in a wire
in opposite directions simultaniously
can be represented in many ways.

But finding the "Simple" way to display it,
and have it be intuitive too is the challange.

Your idea reminds me of older dipole-vectors,
often used in the antenna technology sector.

But again,
it is how to represent your ideas
that may be the challange here.

Communication/language only works,
because we agree on the meaning of words.

Same is true in the many branches of science,
be they (Ideas) represented with math or models.

With each branch of the sciences using
their own "Language" to represent things,
it is no wonder they arrive at the same conclusion
in completely different ways from each other,
but cannot accept each others methods used
to arrive at that identical outcome of data...

Finding a simple model (Like your asserting here)
would go a long way to lowering those barriers.

[david lambright]

http://www.energeticforum.com/members/david-lambright.html .....read this

[exnihiloest]

No gibberish, please. Only observations, facts and measurements. Theory, after.

[TinselKoala]

Proof you have? Let's see it then.


A THEORY does several things: it explains existing phenomena in a coherent manner. Coherent means that it does not contradict what is already known. It also makes NEW PREDICTIONS of phenomena that are not yet understood. That is, any real theory of anything generates testable HYPOTHESES, which are "if-then" statements. If I hook up these components in this manner and put in thus signal for x time, I will then observe Y behaviour, which is NOT already predicted by current existing theories like QED which you are apparently trying to replace.

So, Mr. Lambright, I challenge you to use your "theory" to generate a testable hypothesis that reveals behaviour that is currently unexplained by the standard theories that are being used today to make things like computers and spacecraft and nylon stockings.

If you and your "theory" cannot do that much, then it's not a theory at all, but just a bunch of word salad, with a low-fat vinaigrette dressing.