Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



FEMM simulation showing COP 3 and 7

Started by broli, February 01, 2011, 06:12:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

neptune

Omnibus makes the point that we have very little spare energy available , and the way forward is to either increase the available energy , or improve the engineering . The second option is the one available right now . I accept that a very high degree of craftsmanship is required , But on the other hand look at the work of Clanzer for example. There are also others of the same caliber . There are also some
excellent model engineers out there , and clock makers . Success will come from the combination of the right design and the right man to build it . The correct design will be a compromise , as always . Look at the work of Finsrud . Even if it is fake , you have got to admire the engineering . The correct design will have a minimum of moving parts , two or three max , even .if that means that the path of the moving cores is less than ideal .

neptune

A possible simple design .Imagine a wheel with a horizontal axis . near the perimeter is a magnet [one magnet in the simple version . more later .] Suspended above the wheel is another magnet . As the two magnets approach each other they attract . When they reach the cosest point , the core comes into play .The core consists of an iron channel [ a square tube with one side removed .] The open side of the channel is downwards . It is mounted on a pivoted arm and it drops down to cover the two magnets .It is controlled by a cam . The principle is a bit like the Roberts33 motor combined with the action of Bruce's "magnetic toy" shown on his you tube Chanel , but the channel of the magnetic toy is now inverted . There you go , only two moving parts .

broli

Quote from: spinn_MP on February 04, 2011, 06:05:54 AM
I would not trust FEMM or any other sim program, showing OU.

One of the main problems with Steorn's 2007 Kinetica fiasco (beside the lighting and doubters) was a FEMM program showing OU....

As far as I recall PM orbo shows an energy increase per cycle using a torque transducer, but this increase is in the mJ range so almost useless for practical purposes.

The sim I did is based on an experimental proof of concept that shows similar behavior. The energy gain per cycle is tens of J's which is very real and big.

Omnibus

Where is the FEMM program showing OU in Orbo? Also, can you give a link to Bruce's 'magnetic toy'?

neptune

@Omnibus remagnetic toy . I do not know how to create a link . Go to reply#
1 page one of this thread by Broli . There you will find a link to Bruces motor A3 . this link takes you to a Youtube page , and you will see the magnetic toy vid listed in the column on the right .