FEMM simulation showing COP 3 and 7

[Low-Q]

I really like the pre-painted steel strapping idea for the cores.  A rotary system does appear to be much simpler than a linear system also.  This is a good start, and the best thing of all, it can be done without the need to have the parts machined, etc. which should reduce the cost.

GB

This is pretty much what they use to make toroide transformer cores. I have now a lot of strap tie ribbons because they used it on all the materials for the roof on my new house I'm building. Finally I get a garage too to do all the experiments in

[neptune]

@broli . Excellent design , excellent artwork . I would like to illustrate my design in the same way . Unfortunately , due to having very poor eyesight these days , I am unable to do it . It would be really nice if you , or someone else could draw it for me . I f there are points about the design which are unclear , then just ask . Many thanks , Neptune .

[broli]

@broli . Excellent design , excellent artwork . I would like to illustrate my design in the same way . Unfortunately , due to having very poor eyesight these days , I am unable to do it . It would be really nice if you , or someone else could draw it for me . I f there are points about the design which are unclear , then just ask . Many thanks , Neptune .

@neptune, I would but I can't promise much, due to time and motivation constraints. If a good idea needs to be visualized for true understanding then I can help, but not necessarily if the idea can be conveyed in a simple diagram.

Currently I'm continuously rethinking the concept of this thread. Going through with the purely mechanical variant will ensue many issues at higher speeds, but then again we wouldn't need many cycles per second for a proof of concept. But then again I don't want to waist much time on little output.

I think a continuously rotating setup with no secondary motion would be the easiest to build. I'm talking about something similar to this:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10021.5

In fact the stationary magnets there are not needed. We know that irregardless of the poles of the magnets the attraction or repulsion of two magnets trapped between a ferromagnetic materials is reduced significantly or elliminated completely. So irregardless of the field the coil produces it has no mechanical effect on the rotor magnets. We just need to make sure the air gap is tight.

This setup would easily allow us to have 50 to 60 cycles per second at approximately 3000-3600 RPM.

[exnihiloest]

exnihiloest, I'll say this early on irregardless of your content. Please refrain from posting in this thread which I created. This also counts for your friend spinn_MP.

Thanks.

I replied about who said "I will post over 1200 drawings of over 1200 ideas", not about you.
I do not obey the censors, particularly those spreading or supporting useless matter about clearly fallacious FE claims.
Sorry for that.

[broli]

I do not obey the censors, particularly those spreading or supporting useless matter about clearly fallacious FE claims.
Sorry for that.

If you don't like it go make your own thread or even better your own forum. This is not your forum, this is not a public place and your opinion is meaningless. Go take your free speech bullshit elsewhere buddy because you seem to misunderstand the difference between a privately owned forum and a public place. If you keep ignoring the polite request I'll ask for moderation of this thread and shut your anti progressive negative bullshit by force.