Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Groundloop]

The "results" I have shown in the simulation using the same measurement as yours, are no more "overunity" (or COP>1) than they would be if you were to place one scope probe on the Vbat 60V (or 72V) battery feed as before, but for the second probe you placed it across one of the batteries in reverse (with an isolated probe so as not to ground-short the system). If you now multiplied these two probe voltages together (60V x -12V), then applied a MEAN function, you would have a "result" equating to approximately -720W appearing to go back into the battery!

Guys - what Poynty is trying to say here is that the positive of the probe across the CSR is directly on the NEGATIVE RAIL of the battery and that the ground is between the CSR and the Gate of Q2.  I ASSURE YOU THIS IS ABSOLUTE NONSENSE.  The positive of the probe from the Scope is on the Far side of the CSR - near the gate and the GROUND of the SCOPE is up against the negative terminal.  I will photograph this if required.  But will only be able to upload all tomorrow.  THIS BECAUSE I'VE BEEN HACKED TO DEATH.

Groundloop I see your post but not the schematic.  If you can email this I'll be glad.  But I'm ABSOLUTELY SATISFIED that it'll now be correct.  Many thanks indeed for your input.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

Rosemary,

I have emailed you a copy converted to JPG.

GL.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Well Cat - if that's the case then I wonder what on EARTH has belief got to do with science.  Isn't it rather dependent on EVIDENCE.  Isn't belief something that has everything to do with philosophy or even theology and absolutely NOTHING WHATSOEVER with SCIENCE?

GOLLY.  Next we'll be determining the proof of dark energy through public opinion poll.  What a laugh.  Science - not only by consensus but requiring nothing more than popular support.  It rather corrupts the purity of it's rather contentious truths if science must first be subjected to a political forum.  And I think that if science were still to be evaluated by some kind of democratic principle then we're really in deep water.  Didn't we leave that mind set behind with the Middle Ages?

Is that what the poll is?  I can't read it.  I'll check it out in the morning.  ROLL ON THURSDAY when I'll get my computers cleaned. 

Regards,
Rosie

edited.  Much need spelling correction 

[poynt99]

The position of the shunt directly on the negative rail of the supply source is THE CORRECT way to determine the flow of current through and from that supply.  There is NO OTHER WAY.

I've been meaning to address this, and since this is the second time you've mentioned it, I'll ask this now:

Since the CSR has apparently recently been relocated to a different position with different connections (and hence different measurements), is the above an assertion which constitutes an open admission that all the previous "results" (with the previous configuration) obtained and illustrated both via scope shots, and the demonstration video are no longer accurate and valid?

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

This is your comment Poynty.

Since the CSR has apparently recently been relocated to a different position with different connections (and hence different measurements), is the above an assertion which constitutes an open admission that all the previous "results" (with the previous configuration) obtained and illustrated both via scope shots, and the demonstration video are no longer accurate and valid?

.99

And I've answered it here.  And this is just one of MANY such references.  I'll dig them all out when this computer is less 'sticky' and I can find them all.

THAT’s how it’s configured. And that’s how it needs to be configured.  HOWEVER â€" if you â€" for any reason CANNOT put the ground directly onto Q2 Gate.  NO PROBLEM.  Just put it onto the source rail directly â€" in front of or after the CSR.  IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE TO THE RESULTS â€" Just marginal variations at BEST.

Clearly you either don't read what I write or you can't or you won't or you do but just pretend that you don't.  Golly.  That's quite a lot of options.  In any event.  It would help if you'd read them first off because then we'd be able to eliminate 2/3's of this already overly large thread - and we'd be able to get back on topic.  So.  All in all, I'd recommend it.

Rosie

[i_ron]

The poll is not about stopping you posting or getting you band, it is about whether the members here believe your circuit does what you claim.

Talk about "nuspeak" The ones who made the pole, with their own preconceived ideas, are the ones who will vote in the poll. Ergo, the pole will be close to 100% in favor of disbelief... amazing!

Ron