Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

Started by hartiberlin, February 20, 2011, 06:14:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie


The "results" I have shown in the simulation using the same measurement as yours, are no more "overunity" (or COP>1) than they would be if you were to place one scope probe on the Vbat 60V (or 72V) battery feed as before, but for the second probe you placed it across one of the batteries in reverse (with an isolated probe so as not to ground-short the system). If you now multiplied these two probe voltages together (60V x -12V), then applied a MEAN function, you would have a "result" equating to approximately -720W appearing to go back into the battery!

Guys - what Poynty is trying to say here is that the positive of the probe across the CSR is directly on the NEGATIVE RAIL of the battery and that the ground is between the CSR and the Gate of Q2.  I ASSURE YOU THIS IS ABSOLUTE NONSENSE.  The positive of the probe from the Scope is on the Far side of the CSR - near the gate and the GROUND of the SCOPE is up against the negative terminal.  I will photograph this if required.  But will only be able to upload all tomorrow.  THIS BECAUSE I'VE BEEN HACKED TO DEATH.

Groundloop I see your post but not the schematic.  If you can email this I'll be glad.  But I'm ABSOLUTELY SATISFIED that it'll now be correct.  Many thanks indeed for your input.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

poynt99

Quote from: Pirate88179 on May 04, 2011, 02:37:57 PM
Those were supplied as requested.  They were ignored.  None of the supplied questions were repeats of the existing questions.  They just were not biased toward the negative like the originals.

Bill

I honestly have not looked at that thread for a while. I am at work, and when I have a moment, I have been analyzing Rose's latest connection diagram, kindly provided by GL.

I'll go look at your proposed additions momentarily. Your patience in getting those added is appreciated.

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

Rosemary Ainslie

And what in Heaven's name is all this nonsense about a poll?  Are you trying to determine my rights to post here on this forum.  Good heavens.  I don't think that's in dispute.  And, in any event, Harti is the one who decides that. 

It just beggars belief.  I'm a well meaning - in fact an 'ardent' - promoter or some really required technology - and instead of being welcomed and protected Poynty's now subjecting me to the embarrassment and indignity of an opinion poll.  I wonder if his excesses are now getting grossly out of hand.  I'm not sure that my efforts are deserving of so much flagrant disrespect.  Come on guys.  Is this a forum for discussion or an arena for assassination?  This is absolutely untenable.

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

And just to round off the discussion.  I saw Poynty's argument coming at me with all the subtlety of bull elephant charge.  Here's the FACTS.

The shunt resistor has an inductive component.  That needs to be factored into all analysis of the current flow.  BUT.  The position of the shunt directly on the negative rail of the supply source is THE CORRECT way to determine the flow of current through and from that supply.  There is NO OTHER WAY.  And lol.  I am CERTAINLY capable of putting the probes in the wrong positions.  But I would be very sorry if you thought that our team members are likely to. 

Actually it's nice to see how desparate are these objections.  And how facile.  I'm beginning to feel a bit more relaxed about things.  lol.

Kindest regards
Rosie

powercat

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 04, 2011, 02:46:41 PM
And what in Heaven's name is all this nonsense about a poll?  Are you trying to determine my rights to post here on this forum.  Good heavens.  I don't think that's in dispute.  And, in any event, Harti is the one who decides that. 

It just beggars belief.  I'm a well meaning - in fact an 'ardent' - promoter or some really required technology - and instead of being welcomed and protected Poynty's now subjecting me to the embarrassment and indignity of an opinion poll.  I wonder if his excesses are now getting grossly out of hand.  I'm not sure that my efforts are deserving of so much flagrant disrespect.  Come on guys.  Is this a forum for discussion or an arena for assassination?  This is absolutely untenable.

Rosemary

The poll is not about stopping you posting or getting you band, it is about whether the members here believe your circuit does what you claim.
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall